ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Aya Expanse 32B vs Hermes 3 405B Instruct vs Vision Small

Vision Small comes out ahead, 61 to 32 and 29 on our weighted score, though Aya Expanse 32B is 2.1× cheaper per token.

  1. Cohere

    Aya Expanse 32B

    Released Oct 24, 2024

    32/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.50 / $1.50
    • Context128K
  2. Nous Research

    Hermes 3 405B Instruct

    Released Aug 16, 2024

    29/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.00 / $1.00
    • Context131K
  3. Our pick

    Vispark

    Vision Small

    Released May 15, 2024

    61/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.05 / $3.16
    • Context1M
01 — Verdict

Vision Small is our pick

Vision Small is the better all-round choice, scoring 61/100 against Aya Expanse 32B (32) and Hermes 3 405B Instruct (29). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Aya Expanse 32B wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceAya Expanse 32BAya Expanse 32B $0.75 · Hermes 3 405B Instruct $1.00 · Vision Small $1.58 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextVision SmallVision Small 1,000,000 · Hermes 3 405B Instruct 131,072 · Aya Expanse 32B 128,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsVision SmallAya Expanse 32B: Text · Hermes 3 405B Instruct: Text · Vision Small: Text, Images, PDFs, Audio, Video
  • Self-hostingAya Expanse 32B and Hermes 3 405B InstructPublishes downloadable weights (CC-BY-NC-4.0)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightAya Expanse 32BHermes 3 405B InstructVision Small
Price50%534839
Inputs & features30%00100
Context window20%242560
Overall100%32/10029/10061/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Aya Expanse 32B vs Hermes 3 405B Instruct vs Vision Small specifications side by side
SpecificationAya Expanse 32BCohereHermes 3 405B InstructNous ResearchVision SmallVispark
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.50 (best)$1.00$1.05
Output$1.50$1.00 (best)$3.16
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$0.75 (best)$1.00$1.58
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Cohere APIMedian of 5 providersOfficial Vispark API
Limits
Context window128,000 tokens131,072 tokens1,000,000 tokens (best)
Max output4,000 tokens16,384 tokens65,536 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoYes
PDFsNoNoYes
AudioNoNoYes
VideoNoNoYes
ReasoningNoNoYes
Tool callingNoNoYes
Structured outputNoNoYes
Availability
WeightsOpenCC-BY-NC-4.0OpenProprietary
API model IDc4ai-aya-expanse-32b—vispark/vision-small
API providers25 (best)1
ReleasedOct 24, 2024Aug 16, 2024May 15, 2024
Knowledge cutoff—Dec 31, 2023—
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Aya Expanse 32B$8.00
  • Hermes 3 405B Instruct$12.00
  • Vision Small$16.82
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Aya Expanse 32B, Hermes 3 405B Instruct or Vision Small?

Vision Small is the better all-round choice, scoring 61/100 against Aya Expanse 32B (32) and Hermes 3 405B Instruct (29). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Aya Expanse 32B wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Aya Expanse 32B, Hermes 3 405B Instruct or Vision Small?

Aya Expanse 32B is cheaper at $0.50 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (official Cohere API price). Hermes 3 405B Instruct costs $1.00 input / $1.00 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers); Vision Small costs $1.05 input / $3.16 output per million tokens (official Vispark API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.75 per million tokens for Aya Expanse 32B versus $1.00 for Hermes 3 405B Instruct (1.3× as much) and $1.58 for Vision Small (2.1× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Aya Expanse 32B has not been scored yet, Hermes 3 405B Instruct has not been scored yet and Vision Small has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Aya Expanse 32B, Hermes 3 405B Instruct and Vision Small yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Aya Expanse 32B and Hermes 3 405B Instruct does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

Vision Small has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 131,072 for Hermes 3 405B Instruct and 128,000 for Aya Expanse 32B. Maximum output per response: Aya Expanse 32B up to 4,000, Hermes 3 405B Instruct up to 16,384, Vision Small up to 65,536 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Aya Expanse 32B accepts text; Hermes 3 405B Instruct accepts text; Vision Small accepts text, images, PDFs, audio and video. Vision Small handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Aya Expanse 32B and Hermes 3 405B Instruct publishes its weights (CC-BY-NC-4.0) and can be self-hosted; Vision Small is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Aya Expanse 32B is the newest, released Oct 24, 2024. Hermes 3 405B Instruct came out Aug 16, 2024; Vision Small came out May 15, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Hermes 3 405B Instruct Dec 31, 2023.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.