ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

Aya Expanse 32B vs Hermes 3 405B Instruct vs solar-mini

solar-mini comes out ahead, 50 to 32 and 29 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Cohere

    Aya Expanse 32B

    Released Oct 24, 2024

    32/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.50 / $1.50
    • Context128K
  2. Nous Research

    Hermes 3 405B Instruct

    Released Aug 16, 2024

    29/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.00 / $1.00
    • Context131K
  3. Our pick

    Upstage

    solar-mini

    Released Jun 12, 2024

    50/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.15 / $0.15
    • Context33K
01 — Verdict

solar-mini is our pick

solar-mini is the better all-round choice, scoring 50/100 against Aya Expanse 32B (32) and Hermes 3 405B Instruct (29). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest pricesolar-minisolar-mini $0.15 · Aya Expanse 32B $0.75 · Hermes 3 405B Instruct $1.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextHermes 3 405B InstructHermes 3 405B Instruct 131,072 · Aya Expanse 32B 128,000 · solar-mini 32,768 tokens
  • Widest inputsSame inputsAya Expanse 32B: Text · Hermes 3 405B Instruct: Text · solar-mini: Text
  • Self-hostingAya Expanse 32B and Hermes 3 405B InstructPublishes downloadable weights (CC-BY-NC-4.0)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightAya Expanse 32BHermes 3 405B Instructsolar-mini
Price50%534885
Inputs & features30%0025
Context window20%24250
Overall100%32/10029/10050/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Aya Expanse 32B vs Hermes 3 405B Instruct vs solar-mini specifications side by side
SpecificationAya Expanse 32BCohereHermes 3 405B InstructNous Researchsolar-miniUpstage
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.50$1.00$0.15 (best)
Output$1.50$1.00$0.15 (best)
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$0.75$1.00$0.15 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Cohere APIMedian of 5 providersOfficial Upstage API
Limits
Context window128,000 tokens131,072 tokens (best)32,768 tokens
Max output4,000 tokens16,384 tokens (best)4,096 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningNoNoNo
Tool callingNoNoYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenCC-BY-NC-4.0OpenProprietary
API model IDc4ai-aya-expanse-32b—solar-mini
API providers25 (best)1
ReleasedOct 24, 2024Aug 16, 2024Jun 12, 2024
Knowledge cutoff—Dec 31, 2023Sep 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Aya Expanse 32B$8.00
  • Hermes 3 405B Instruct$12.00
  • solar-mini$1.80
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Aya Expanse 32B, Hermes 3 405B Instruct or solar-mini?

solar-mini is the better all-round choice, scoring 50/100 against Aya Expanse 32B (32) and Hermes 3 405B Instruct (29). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Aya Expanse 32B, Hermes 3 405B Instruct or solar-mini?

solar-mini is cheaper at $0.15 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (official Upstage API price). Aya Expanse 32B costs $0.50 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (official Cohere API price); Hermes 3 405B Instruct costs $1.00 input / $1.00 output per million tokens (median across 5 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.15 per million tokens for solar-mini versus $0.75 for Aya Expanse 32B (5× as much) and $1.00 for Hermes 3 405B Instruct (6.7× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Aya Expanse 32B has not been scored yet, Hermes 3 405B Instruct has not been scored yet and solar-mini has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Aya Expanse 32B, Hermes 3 405B Instruct and solar-mini yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Aya Expanse 32B and Hermes 3 405B Instruct does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

Hermes 3 405B Instruct has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 128,000 for Aya Expanse 32B and 32,768 for solar-mini. Maximum output per response: Aya Expanse 32B up to 4,000, Hermes 3 405B Instruct up to 16,384, solar-mini up to 4,096 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Aya Expanse 32B accepts text; Hermes 3 405B Instruct accepts text; solar-mini accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.

Are any of these open source?

Aya Expanse 32B and Hermes 3 405B Instruct publishes its weights (CC-BY-NC-4.0) and can be self-hosted; solar-mini is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Aya Expanse 32B is the newest, released Oct 24, 2024. Hermes 3 405B Instruct came out Aug 16, 2024; solar-mini came out Jun 12, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Hermes 3 405B Instruct Dec 31, 2023, solar-mini Sep 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.