ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual vs Voxtral Mini 3B 2507

Too close to call on our weighted score (Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 61, AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual 60). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Z.ai (Zhipu)

    AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual

    Released Dec 10, 2025

    60/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.035 / $0.138
    • Context66K
  2. Mistral AI

    Voxtral Mini 3B 2507

    Released Jul 15, 2025

    61/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.04 / $0.04
    • Context33K
  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 61/100, AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual 60/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 on price and AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceVoxtral Mini 3B 2507Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 $0.04 · AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual $0.061 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextAutoGLM Phone 9B MultilingualAutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual 65,536 · Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 32,768 tokens
  • Widest inputsSame inputsAutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual: Text, Images · Voxtral Mini 3B 2507: Text, Audio
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightAutoGLM Phone 9B MultilingualVoxtral Mini 3B 2507
Price50%100100
Inputs & features30%2535
Context window20%120
Overall100%60/10061/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual vs Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 specifications side by side
SpecificationAutoGLM Phone 9B MultilingualZ.ai (Zhipu)Voxtral Mini 3B 2507Mistral AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)——
ECI rank——
Price per million tokens
Input$0.035 (best)$0.04
Output$0.138$0.04 (best)
Cached input——
Blended (3:1)$0.061$0.04 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 2 providersMedian of 2 providers
Limits
Context window65,536 tokens (best)32,768 tokens
Max output65,536 tokens (best)32,768 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesNo
PDFsNoNo
AudioNoYes
VideoNoNo
ReasoningNoNo
Tool callingNoYes
Structured outputNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenMITOpenApache 2.0
API model ID——
API providers23 (best)
ReleasedDec 10, 2025Jul 15, 2025
Knowledge cutoff——
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual$0.626
  • Voxtral Mini 3B 2507$0.48
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual or Voxtral Mini 3B 2507?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 61/100, AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual 60/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 on price and AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual or Voxtral Mini 3B 2507?

Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 is cheaper at $0.04 input / $0.04 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual costs $0.035 input / $0.138 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.04 per million tokens for Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 versus $0.061 for AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual (1.5× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual has not been scored yet and Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual and Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual has the largest context window at 65,536 tokens, against 32,768 for Voxtral Mini 3B 2507. Maximum output per response: AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual up to 65,536, Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 up to 32,768 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual accepts text and images; Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 accepts text and audio. They handle the same number of input types.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, both publish their weights (MIT and Apache 2.0), so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual is the newest, released Dec 10, 2025. Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 came out Jul 15, 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.