ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Nov 2, 2026

AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual vs GLM-4.7

AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual comes out ahead, 60 to 41 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Our pick

    Z.ai (Zhipu)

    AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual

    Released Dec 10, 2025

    60/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.035 / $0.138
    • Context66K
    Full specs Remove AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual

  2. Z.ai (Zhipu)

    GLM-4.7

    Released Dec 22, 2025

    41/100
    • ECI143.7
    • Price$0.60 / $2.20
    • Context205K
    Full specs Remove GLM-4.7

  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual is our pick

AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual is the better all-round choice, scoring 60/100 against GLM-4.7 (41). It leads on price. GLM-4.7 wins on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceAutoGLM Phone 9B MultilingualAutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual $0.061 · GLM-4.7 $1.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextGLM-4.7GLM-4.7 204,800 · AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual 65,536 tokens
  • Widest inputsAutoGLM Phone 9B MultilingualAutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual: Text, Images · GLM-4.7: Text
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightAutoGLM Phone 9B MultilingualGLM-4.7
Price50%10048
Inputs & features30%2535
Context window20%1232
Overall100%60/10041/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual vs GLM-4.7 specifications side by side
SpecificationAutoGLM Phone 9B MultilingualZ.ai (Zhipu)GLM-4.7Z.ai (Zhipu)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)—143.7
ECI rank—#94 of 165
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions—83.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics—83.3%
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions—32.2%
Price per million tokens
Input$0.035 (best)$0.60
Output$0.138 (best)$2.20
Cached input—$0.11
Blended (3:1)$0.061 (best)$1.00
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 2 providersOfficial Z.AI API
Limits
Context window65,536 tokens204,800 tokens (best)
Max output65,536 tokens131,072 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesYesNo
PDFsNoNo
AudioNoNo
VideoNoNo
ReasoningNoYes
Tool callingNoYes
Structured outputNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenMITOpen
API model ID—glm-4.7
API providers231 (best)
ReleasedDec 10, 2025Dec 22, 2025
Knowledge cutoff—Apr 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual$0.626
  • GLM-4.7$10.40
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual or GLM-4.7?

AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual is the better all-round choice, scoring 60/100 against GLM-4.7 (41). It leads on price. GLM-4.7 wins on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual or GLM-4.7?

AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual is cheaper at $0.035 input / $0.138 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). GLM-4.7 costs $0.60 input / $2.20 output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.061 per million tokens for AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual versus $1.00 for GLM-4.7 (16× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual has not been scored yet and GLM-4.7 has an ECI of 143.7.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual and GLM-4.7 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

GLM-4.7 has the largest context window at 204,800 tokens, against 65,536 for AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual. Maximum output per response: AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual up to 65,536, GLM-4.7 up to 131,072 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual accepts text and images; GLM-4.7 accepts text. AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, both publish their weights (MIT), so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

GLM-4.7 is the newest, released Dec 22, 2025. AutoGLM Phone 9B Multilingual came out Dec 10, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: GLM-4.7 Apr 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Nov 2, 2026.

05 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons