Apertus 70B vs Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)
Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview comes out ahead, 50 to 34 and 33 on our weighted score, though Apertus 70B is 39% cheaper per token.
Swiss AI
Apertus 70B
33/100- ECI—
- Price$0.82 / $2.42
- Context66K
- Our pick
GoogleGemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview
50/100- ECI—
- Price$1.00 / $5.00
- Context131K
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)
34/100- ECI—
- Price$0.50 / $6.00
- Context131K
Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview is our pick
Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 50/100 against Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) (34) and Apertus 70B (33). It leads on inputs & features. Apertus 70B wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceApertus 70BApertus 70B $1.22 · Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) $1.88 · Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview $2.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview 131,072 · Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) 131,072 · Apertus 70B 65,536 tokens
- Widest inputsGemini Robotics-ER 1.6 PreviewApertus 70B: Text · Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview: Text, Images, Audio, Video · Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking): Text
- Self-hostingApertus 70B and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)Publishes downloadable weights (Apache-2.0)
| Measure | Weight | Apertus 70B | Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 46 | 36 | 37 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 25 | 90 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 12 | 24 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 33/100 | 50/100 | 34/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Apertus 70BSwiss AI | Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 PreviewGoogle | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)Alibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.82 | $1.00 | $0.50 (best) |
| Output | $2.42 (best) | $5.00 | $6.00 |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.22 (best) | $2.00 | $1.88 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 3 providers | Median of 1 providers | Official Alibaba API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 65,536 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 8,192 tokens | 65,536 tokens (best) | 32,768 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | Yes | No |
| Video | No | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | OpenApache-2.0 | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | — | — | qwen3-next-80b-a3b-thinking |
| API providers | 3 | 1 | 10 (best) |
| Released | Sep 2, 2025 | Apr 14, 2026 | Sep 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Sep 2025 | Jan 2025 | Apr 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Apertus 70B$13.04
- Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview$20.00
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)$17.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Apertus 70B, Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview or Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)?
Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 50/100 against Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) (34) and Apertus 70B (33). It leads on inputs & features. Apertus 70B wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Apertus 70B, Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview or Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)?
Apertus 70B is cheaper at $0.82 input / $2.42 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) costs $0.50 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price); Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview costs $1.00 input / $5.00 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.22 per million tokens for Apertus 70B versus $1.88 for Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) (1.5× as much) and $2.00 for Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview (1.6× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Apertus 70B has not been scored yet, Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview has not been scored yet and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Apertus 70B, Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) have the largest context windows (131,072 and 131,072 tokens), against 65,536 for Apertus 70B. Maximum output per response: Apertus 70B up to 8,192, Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview up to 65,536, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) up to 32,768 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Apertus 70B accepts text; Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview accepts text, images, audio and video; Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) accepts text. Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Apertus 70B and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) publishes its weights (Apache-2.0) and can be self-hosted; Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview is the newest, released Apr 14, 2026. Apertus 70B came out Sep 2, 2025; Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) came out Sep 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Apertus 70B Sep 2025, Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6 Preview Jan 2025, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) Apr 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
