ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 vs Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507

Too close to call on our weighted score (Voxtral Small 24B 2507 55, Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 52). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Mistral AI

    Voxtral Small 24B 2507

    Released Jul 15, 2025

    55/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.10 / $0.30
    • Context33K
  2. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507

    Released Jul 21, 2025

    52/100
    • ECI138.9
    • Price$0.15 / $0.75
    • Context262K
  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 3 points (Voxtral Small 24B 2507 55/100, Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 52/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Voxtral Small 24B 2507 on price and Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceVoxtral Small 24B 2507Voxtral Small 24B 2507 $0.15 · Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 $0.30 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextQwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 262,144 · Voxtral Small 24B 2507 32,768 tokens
  • Widest inputsVoxtral Small 24B 2507Voxtral Small 24B 2507: Text, Audio · Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507: Text
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightVoxtral Small 24B 2507Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507
Price50%8975
Inputs & features30%3525
Context window20%037
Overall100%55/10052/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 vs Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 specifications side by side
SpecificationVoxtral Small 24B 2507Mistral AIQwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507Alibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)—138.9
ECI rank—#105 of 148
Price per million tokens
Input$0.10 (best)$0.15
Output$0.30 (best)$0.75
Cached input——
Blended (3:1)$0.15 (best)$0.30
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Mistral APIMedian of 11 providers
Limits
Context window32,768 tokens262,144 tokens (best)
Max output32,768 tokens (best)16,384 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesNoNo
PDFsNoNo
AudioYesNo
VideoNoNo
ReasoningNoNo
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenApache 2.0OpenApache 2.0
API model IDvoxtral-small-latest—
API providers711 (best)
ReleasedJul 15, 2025Jul 21, 2025
Knowledge cutoff——
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Voxtral Small 24B 2507$1.60
  • Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507$3.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Voxtral Small 24B 2507 or Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 3 points (Voxtral Small 24B 2507 55/100, Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 52/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Voxtral Small 24B 2507 on price and Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Voxtral Small 24B 2507 or Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507?

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.30 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 costs $0.15 input / $0.75 output per million tokens (median across 11 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.15 per million tokens for Voxtral Small 24B 2507 versus $0.30 for Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 (2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Voxtral Small 24B 2507 has not been scored yet and Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 has an ECI of 138.9.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Voxtral Small 24B 2507 and Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 32,768 for Voxtral Small 24B 2507. Maximum output per response: Voxtral Small 24B 2507 up to 32,768, Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 up to 16,384 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 accepts text and audio; Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 accepts text. Voxtral Small 24B 2507 handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, both publish their weights (Apache 2.0), so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

Qwen3 235B-A22B Instruct 2507 is the newest, released Jul 21, 2025. Voxtral Small 24B 2507 came out Jul 15, 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.