Viv Fast vs Muse Glimmer 30B
Viv Fast comes out ahead, 75 to 57 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
VivgridViv Fast
75/100- ECI—
- Price$0.13 / $0.40
- Context1M
MetaMuse Glimmer 30B
57/100- ECI—
- Price$0.30 / $1.20
- Context131K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Viv Fast is our pick
Viv Fast is the better all-round choice, scoring 75/100 against Muse Glimmer 30B (57). It leads on price and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceViv FastViv Fast $0.198 · Muse Glimmer 30B $0.525 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextViv FastViv Fast 1,000,000 · Muse Glimmer 30B 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsViv Fast: Text, Images · Muse Glimmer 30B: Text, Images
- Self-hostingMuse Glimmer 30BPublishes downloadable weights (Apache 2.0)
| Measure | Weight | Viv Fast | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 83 | 63 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 70 | 70 |
| Context window | 20% | 60 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 75/100 | 57/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Viv FastVivgrid | Muse Glimmer 30BMeta |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.13 (best) | $0.30 |
| Output | $0.40 (best) | $1.20 |
| Cached input | $0.05 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.198 (best) | $0.525 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Vivgrid API | Median of 10 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens |
| Max output | 256,000 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yeslow · high · max | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | OpenApache 2.0 |
| API model ID | viv-fast | — |
| API providers | 1 | 12 (best) |
| Released | Sep 21, 2026 | Aug 10, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Sep 2026 | Jan 4, 2026 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Viv Fast$2.10
- Muse Glimmer 30B$5.40
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Viv Fast or Muse Glimmer 30B?
Viv Fast is the better all-round choice, scoring 75/100 against Muse Glimmer 30B (57). It leads on price and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Viv Fast or Muse Glimmer 30B?
Viv Fast is cheaper at $0.13 input / $0.40 output per million tokens (official Vivgrid API price). Muse Glimmer 30B costs $0.30 input / $1.20 output per million tokens (median across 10 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.198 per million tokens for Viv Fast versus $0.525 for Muse Glimmer 30B (2.7× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Viv Fast has not been scored yet and Muse Glimmer 30B has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Viv Fast and Muse Glimmer 30B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Viv Fast has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 131,072 for Muse Glimmer 30B. Maximum output per response: Viv Fast up to 256,000, Muse Glimmer 30B up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Viv Fast accepts text and images; Muse Glimmer 30B accepts text and images. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Muse Glimmer 30B publishes its weights (Apache 2.0) and can be self-hosted; Viv Fast is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Viv Fast is the newest, released Sep 21, 2026. Muse Glimmer 30B came out Aug 10, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Viv Fast Sep 2026, Muse Glimmer 30B Jan 4, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
