Trinity Mini vs DeepSeek OCR 2 vs Seed 1.6 Flash
Seed 1.6 Flash comes out ahead, 78 to 65 and 32 on our weighted score.
Arcee AITrinity Mini
65/100- ECI—
- Price$0.045 / $0.15
- Context131K
DeepSeekDeepSeek OCR 2
32/100- ECI—
- Price$0.89 / $1.47
- Context8K
- Our pick
ByteDance SeedSeed 1.6 Flash
78/100- ECI—
- Price$0.022 / $0.223
- Context256K
Seed 1.6 Flash is our pick
Seed 1.6 Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 78/100 against Trinity Mini (65) and DeepSeek OCR 2 (32). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceTrinity MiniTrinity Mini $0.071 · Seed 1.6 Flash $0.072 · DeepSeek OCR 2 $1.03 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextSeed 1.6 FlashSeed 1.6 Flash 256,000 · Trinity Mini 131,072 · DeepSeek OCR 2 8,192 tokens
- Widest inputsDeepSeek OCR 2 and Seed 1.6 FlashTrinity Mini: Text · DeepSeek OCR 2: Text, Images · Seed 1.6 Flash: Text, Images
- Self-hostingTrinity Mini and DeepSeek OCR 2Publishes downloadable weights (OpenMDW-1.1)
| Measure | Weight | Trinity Mini | DeepSeek OCR 2 | Seed 1.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 100 | 49 | 100 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 25 | 70 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 0 | 36 |
| Overall | 100% | 65/100 | 32/100 | 78/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Trinity MiniArcee AI | DeepSeek OCR 2DeepSeek | Seed 1.6 FlashByteDance Seed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.045 | $0.89 | $0.022 (best) |
| Output | $0.15 (best) | $1.47 | $0.223 |
| Cached input | — | — | $0.0044 |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.071 (best) | $1.03 | $0.072 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Over 32K: $0.045 / $0.445 |
| Price source | Median of 1 providers | Median of 1 providers | Official Volcengine Ark API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens | 8,192 tokens | 256,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens (best) | 8,192 tokens | 32,000 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | No | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | OpenOpenMDW-1.1 | Open | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | — | doubao-seed-1-6-flash-250828 |
| API providers | 1 | 2 (best) | 2 (best) |
| Released | Dec 1, 2025 | Jan 27, 2026 | Aug 28, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Trinity Mini$0.75
- DeepSeek OCR 2$11.83
- Seed 1.6 Flash$0.668
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Trinity Mini, DeepSeek OCR 2 or Seed 1.6 Flash?
Seed 1.6 Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 78/100 against Trinity Mini (65) and DeepSeek OCR 2 (32). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Trinity Mini, DeepSeek OCR 2 or Seed 1.6 Flash?
Trinity Mini is cheaper at $0.045 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Seed 1.6 Flash costs $0.022 input / $0.223 output per million tokens (official Volcengine Ark API price); DeepSeek OCR 2 costs $0.89 input / $1.47 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.071 per million tokens for Trinity Mini versus $0.072 for Seed 1.6 Flash (1× as much) and $1.03 for DeepSeek OCR 2 (15× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Trinity Mini has not been scored yet, DeepSeek OCR 2 has not been scored yet and Seed 1.6 Flash has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Trinity Mini, DeepSeek OCR 2 and Seed 1.6 Flash yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that DeepSeek OCR 2 does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Seed 1.6 Flash has the largest context window at 256,000 tokens, against 131,072 for Trinity Mini and 8,192 for DeepSeek OCR 2. Maximum output per response: Trinity Mini up to 131,072, DeepSeek OCR 2 up to 8,192, Seed 1.6 Flash up to 32,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Trinity Mini accepts text; DeepSeek OCR 2 accepts text and images; Seed 1.6 Flash accepts text and images. DeepSeek OCR 2 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Trinity Mini and DeepSeek OCR 2 publishes its weights (OpenMDW-1.1) and can be self-hosted; Seed 1.6 Flash is proprietary.
Which is newer?
DeepSeek OCR 2 is the newest, released Jan 27, 2026. Trinity Mini came out Dec 1, 2025; Seed 1.6 Flash came out Aug 28, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
