Trendyol Asure 12B vs Ministral 3 3B vs Seed 2.0 Lite
Too close to call on our weighted score (Ministral 3 3B 74, Seed 2.0 Lite 73, Trendyol Asure 12B 54). The right pick depends on what you value most.
Trendyol
Trendyol Asure 12B
54/100- ECI—
- Price$0.10 / $0.50
- Context131K
Mistral AIMinistral 3 3B
74/100- ECI—
- Price$0.10 / $0.10
- Context262K
ByteDance SeedSeed 2.0 Lite
73/100- ECI—
- Price$0.089 / $0.534
- Context256K
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Ministral 3 3B 74/100, Seed 2.0 Lite 73/100, Trendyol Asure 12B 54/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Ministral 3 3B on price and Ministral 3 3B for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceMinistral 3 3BMinistral 3 3B $0.10 · Trendyol Asure 12B $0.20 · Seed 2.0 Lite $0.20 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMinistral 3 3BMinistral 3 3B 262,144 · Seed 2.0 Lite 256,000 · Trendyol Asure 12B 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsSeed 2.0 LiteTrendyol Asure 12B: Text, Images · Ministral 3 3B: Text, Images · Seed 2.0 Lite: Text, Images, Video
- Self-hostingTrendyol Asure 12B and Ministral 3 3BPublishes downloadable weights (Gemma and Apache 2.0)
| Measure | Weight | Trendyol Asure 12B | Ministral 3 3B | Seed 2.0 Lite |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 83 | 97 | 83 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 25 | 60 | 80 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 37 | 36 |
| Overall | 100% | 54/100 | 74/100 | 73/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Trendyol Asure 12BTrendyol | Ministral 3 3BMistral AI | Seed 2.0 LiteByteDance Seed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.10 | $0.10 | $0.089 (best) |
| Output | $0.50 | $0.10 (best) | $0.534 |
| Cached input | — | — | $0.018 |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.20 | $0.10 (best) | $0.20 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Over 32K: $0.134 / $0.802 |
| Price source | Median of 1 providers | Median of 1 providers | Official Volcengine Ark API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) | 256,000 tokens |
| Max output | — | 262,144 tokens (best) | 32,000 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | No | Yesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · max |
| Tool calling | No | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | OpenGemma | OpenApache 2.0 | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | — | doubao-seed-2-0-lite-260428 |
| API providers | 1 | 1 | 6 (best) |
| Released | Feb 19, 2026 | Dec 2, 2025 | Feb 14, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Trendyol Asure 12B$2.00
- Ministral 3 3B$1.20
- Seed 2.0 Lite$1.96
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Trendyol Asure 12B, Ministral 3 3B or Seed 2.0 Lite?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Ministral 3 3B 74/100, Seed 2.0 Lite 73/100, Trendyol Asure 12B 54/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Ministral 3 3B on price and Ministral 3 3B for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Trendyol Asure 12B, Ministral 3 3B or Seed 2.0 Lite?
Ministral 3 3B is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.10 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Trendyol Asure 12B costs $0.10 input / $0.50 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider); Seed 2.0 Lite costs $0.089 input / $0.534 output per million tokens (official Volcengine Ark API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.10 per million tokens for Ministral 3 3B versus $0.20 for Trendyol Asure 12B (2× as much) and $0.20 for Seed 2.0 Lite (2× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Trendyol Asure 12B has not been scored yet, Ministral 3 3B has not been scored yet and Seed 2.0 Lite has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Trendyol Asure 12B, Ministral 3 3B and Seed 2.0 Lite yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Trendyol Asure 12B does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Ministral 3 3B has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 256,000 for Seed 2.0 Lite and 131,072 for Trendyol Asure 12B. Maximum output per response: Ministral 3 3B up to 262,144, Seed 2.0 Lite up to 32,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Trendyol Asure 12B accepts text and images; Ministral 3 3B accepts text and images; Seed 2.0 Lite accepts text, images and video. Seed 2.0 Lite handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Trendyol Asure 12B and Ministral 3 3B publishes its weights (Gemma and Apache 2.0) and can be self-hosted; Seed 2.0 Lite is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Trendyol Asure 12B is the newest, released Feb 19, 2026. Seed 2.0 Lite came out Feb 14, 2026; Ministral 3 3B came out Dec 2, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
