Trendyol Asure 12B vs GPT-5-Codex
Trendyol Asure 12B comes out ahead, 54 to 42 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
Trendyol
Trendyol Asure 12B
54/100- ECI—
- Price$0.10 / $0.50
- Context131K
OpenAIGPT-5-Codex
42/100- ECI—
- Price$1.25 / $10.00
- Context400K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Trendyol Asure 12B is our pick
Trendyol Asure 12B is the better all-round choice, scoring 54/100 against GPT-5-Codex (42). It leads on price. GPT-5-Codex wins on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceTrendyol Asure 12BTrendyol Asure 12B $0.20 · GPT-5-Codex $3.44 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGPT-5-CodexGPT-5-Codex 400,000 · Trendyol Asure 12B 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsTrendyol Asure 12B: Text, Images · GPT-5-Codex: Text, Images
- Self-hostingTrendyol Asure 12BPublishes downloadable weights (Gemma)
| Measure | Weight | Trendyol Asure 12B | GPT-5-Codex |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 83 | 24 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 25 | 70 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 44 |
| Overall | 100% | 54/100 | 42/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Trendyol Asure 12BTrendyol | GPT-5-CodexOpenAI |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.10 (best) | $1.25 |
| Output | $0.50 (best) | $10.00 |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.20 (best) | $3.44 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 1 providers | Median of 3 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens | 400,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | — | 128,000 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | No | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | OpenGemma | Proprietary |
| API model ID | — | — |
| API providers | 1 | 3 (best) |
| Released | Feb 19, 2026 | Sep 15, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Sep 30, 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Trendyol Asure 12B$2.00
- GPT-5-Codex$32.50
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Trendyol Asure 12B or GPT-5-Codex?
Trendyol Asure 12B is the better all-round choice, scoring 54/100 against GPT-5-Codex (42). It leads on price. GPT-5-Codex wins on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Trendyol Asure 12B or GPT-5-Codex?
Trendyol Asure 12B is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.50 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). GPT-5-Codex costs $1.25 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.20 per million tokens for Trendyol Asure 12B versus $3.44 for GPT-5-Codex (17× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Trendyol Asure 12B has not been scored yet and GPT-5-Codex has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Trendyol Asure 12B and GPT-5-Codex yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Trendyol Asure 12B does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5-Codex has the largest context window at 400,000 tokens, against 131,072 for Trendyol Asure 12B. Maximum output per response: GPT-5-Codex up to 128,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Trendyol Asure 12B accepts text and images; GPT-5-Codex accepts text and images. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Trendyol Asure 12B publishes its weights (Gemma) and can be self-hosted; GPT-5-Codex is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Trendyol Asure 12B is the newest, released Feb 19, 2026. GPT-5-Codex came out Sep 15, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-5-Codex Sep 30, 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
