ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Toast 1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

Too close to call on our weighted score (DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp 70, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning 69, Toast 1 47). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Mixedbread

    Toast 1

    Released Aug 13, 2026

    47/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.30 / $0.72
    • Context131K
  2. NVIDIA

    Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning

    Released Apr 28, 2026

    69/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.25 / $0.85
    • Context256K
  3. DeepSeek

    DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp

    Released Aug 21, 2026

    70/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.216 / $0.647
    • Context1M
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp 70/100, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning 69/100, Toast 1 47/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp on price and DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp $0.323 · Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning $0.40 · Toast 1 $0.405 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp 1,000,000 · Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning 256,000 · Toast 1 131,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B ReasoningToast 1: Text · Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning: Text, Images, Audio, Video · DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning and DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpPublishes downloadable weights (MIT)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightToast 1Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B ReasoningDeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp
Price50%686973
Inputs & features30%259070
Context window20%243660
Overall100%47/10069/10070/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Toast 1 vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp specifications side by side
SpecificationToast 1MixedbreadNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B ReasoningNVIDIADeepSeek V4 Flash Vision ExpDeepSeek
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.30$0.25$0.216 (best)
Output$0.72$0.85$0.647 (best)
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$0.405$0.40$0.323 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 1 providersMedian of 4 providersMedian of 15 providers
Limits
Context window131,000 tokens256,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens (best)
Max output4,000 tokens65,536 tokens384,000 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoYesYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoYesNo
VideoNoYesNo
ReasoningNoYesYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoYesYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenOpenMIT
API model ID—nvidia/nemotron-3-nano-omni-30b-a3b-reasoning—
API providers1815 (best)
ReleasedAug 13, 2026Apr 28, 2026Aug 21, 2026
Knowledge cutoff———
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Toast 1$4.44
  • Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning$4.20
  • DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp$3.45
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Toast 1, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning or DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp 70/100, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning 69/100, Toast 1 47/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp on price and DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Toast 1, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning or DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp?

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is cheaper at $0.216 input / $0.647 output per million tokens (median across 15 API providers). Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning costs $0.25 input / $0.85 output per million tokens (median across 4 API providers; free on Nvidia); Toast 1 costs $0.30 input / $0.72 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.323 per million tokens for DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp versus $0.40 for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning (1.2× as much) and $0.405 for Toast 1 (1.3× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Toast 1 has not been scored yet, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning has not been scored yet and DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Toast 1, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning and DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 256,000 for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning and 131,000 for Toast 1. Maximum output per response: Toast 1 up to 4,000, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning up to 65,536, DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp up to 384,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Toast 1 accepts text; Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning accepts text, images, audio and video; DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp accepts text and images. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning and DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp publishes its weights (MIT) and can be self-hosted; Toast 1 is proprietary.

Which is newer?

DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision Exp is the newest, released Aug 21, 2026. Toast 1 came out Aug 13, 2026; Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning came out Apr 28, 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.