Tiny Aya Global vs Seed 2.0 Code vs Sarvam 30B
Seed 2.0 Code comes out ahead, 63 to 31 and 15 on our weighted score, though Sarvam 30B is 24× cheaper per token.
CohereTiny Aya Global
15/100- ECI—
- Price—
- Context8K
- Our pick
ByteDance SeedSeed 2.0 Code
63/100- ECI—
- Price$0.475 / $2.37
- Context262K
Sarvam AI
Sarvam 30B
31/100- ECI—
- Price$0.02 / $0.10
- Context128K
Seed 2.0 Code is our pick
Seed 2.0 Code is the better all-round choice, scoring 63/100 against Sarvam 30B (31) and Tiny Aya Global (15). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceSarvam 30BSarvam 30B $0.04 · Seed 2.0 Code $0.95 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Tiny Aya Global unpriced
- Longest contextSeed 2.0 CodeSeed 2.0 Code 262,144 · Sarvam 30B 128,000 · Tiny Aya Global 8,000 tokens
- Widest inputsSeed 2.0 CodeTiny Aya Global: Text · Seed 2.0 Code: Text, Images, Video · Sarvam 30B: Text
- Self-hostingTiny Aya Global and Sarvam 30BPublishes downloadable weights (CC-BY-NC-4.0)
| Measure | Weight | Tiny Aya Global | Seed 2.0 Code | Sarvam 30B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inputs & features | 60% | 25 | 80 | 35 |
| Context window | 40% | 0 | 37 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 15/100 | 63/100 | 31/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Tiny Aya GlobalCohere | Seed 2.0 CodeByteDance Seed | Sarvam 30BSarvam AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | — | $0.475 | $0.02 (best) |
| Output | — | $2.37 | $0.10 (best) |
| Cached input | — | $0.095 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | — | $0.95 | $0.04 (best) |
| Long-context rate | — | Over 32K: $0.712 / $3.56 | Same rate |
| Price source | — | Official Volcengine Ark API | Median of 1 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 8,000 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) | 128,000 tokens |
| Max output | 8,000 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) | 128,000 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · max | Yes · low · medium · high |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | OpenCC-BY-NC-4.0 | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | tiny-aya-global | doubao-seed-2-0-code-preview-260215 | sarvam-30b |
| API providers | 1 | 10 (best) | 2 |
| Released | Feb 17, 2026 | Feb 14, 2026 | Feb 18, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Tiny Aya Global—
- Seed 2.0 Code$9.50
- Sarvam 30B$0.40
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Tiny Aya Global, Seed 2.0 Code or Sarvam 30B?
Seed 2.0 Code is the better all-round choice, scoring 63/100 against Sarvam 30B (31) and Tiny Aya Global (15). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Tiny Aya Global, Seed 2.0 Code or Sarvam 30B?
Sarvam 30B is cheaper at $0.02 input / $0.10 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Seed 2.0 Code costs $0.475 input / $2.37 output per million tokens (official Volcengine Ark API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.04 per million tokens for Sarvam 30B versus $0.95 for Seed 2.0 Code (24× as much). Tiny Aya Global has no published per-token price.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Tiny Aya Global has not been scored yet, Seed 2.0 Code has not been scored yet and Sarvam 30B has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Tiny Aya Global, Seed 2.0 Code and Sarvam 30B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Seed 2.0 Code has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 128,000 for Sarvam 30B and 8,000 for Tiny Aya Global. Maximum output per response: Tiny Aya Global up to 8,000, Seed 2.0 Code up to 131,072, Sarvam 30B up to 128,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Tiny Aya Global accepts text; Seed 2.0 Code accepts text, images and video; Sarvam 30B accepts text. Seed 2.0 Code handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Tiny Aya Global and Sarvam 30B publishes its weights (CC-BY-NC-4.0) and can be self-hosted; Seed 2.0 Code is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Sarvam 30B is the newest, released Feb 18, 2026. Tiny Aya Global came out Feb 17, 2026; Seed 2.0 Code came out Feb 14, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
