ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Step 5 Preview vs North Small Translate vs LongCat-2.5-Preview

Step 5 Preview comes out ahead, 57 to 52 and 50 on our weighted score.

  1. Our pick

    StepFun

    Step 5 Preview

    Released Sep 16, 2026

    57/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.00 / $2.70
    • Context1M
  2. Cohere

    North Small Translate

    Released Sep 9, 2026

    50/100
    • ECI—
    • PriceFree / Free
    • Context16K
  3. Meituan (LongCat)

    LongCat-2.5-Preview

    Released Sep 25, 2026

    52/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.75 / $2.95
    • Context1M
01 — Verdict

Step 5 Preview is our pick

Step 5 Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 57/100 against LongCat-2.5-Preview (52) and North Small Translate (50). It leads on inputs & features. North Small Translate wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceNorth Small TranslateNorth Small Translate Free · LongCat-2.5-Preview $1.30 · Step 5 Preview $1.43 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextStep 5 Preview and LongCat-2.5-PreviewStep 5 Preview 1,000,000 · LongCat-2.5-Preview 1,000,000 · North Small Translate 16,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsStep 5 PreviewStep 5 Preview: Text, Images, Video · North Small Translate: Text · LongCat-2.5-Preview: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingNorth Small TranslatePublishes downloadable weights (CC-BY-NC-4.0)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightStep 5 PreviewNorth Small TranslateLongCat-2.5-Preview
Price50%4310044
Inputs & features30%80060
Context window20%60060
Overall100%57/10050/10052/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Step 5 Preview vs North Small Translate vs LongCat-2.5-Preview specifications side by side
SpecificationStep 5 PreviewStepFunNorth Small TranslateCohereLongCat-2.5-PreviewMeituan (LongCat)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$1.00Free (best)$0.75
Output$2.70Free (best)$2.95
Cached input$0.05——
Blended (3:1)$1.43Free (best)$1.30
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial StepFun (Global) APIOfficial Cohere APIMedian of 1 providers
Limits
Context window1,000,000 tokens (best)16,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens (best)
Max output1,000,000 tokens (best)16,000 tokens131,072 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesNoYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoYesNoNo
ReasoningYeslow · medium · highNoYes
Tool callingYesNoYes
Structured outputYesNoNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenCC-BY-NC-4.0Proprietary
API model IDstep-5-previewnorth-small-translate-09-2026—
API providers7 (best)12
ReleasedSep 16, 2026Sep 9, 2026Sep 25, 2026
Knowledge cutoff———
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Step 5 Preview$15.40
  • North Small TranslateFree
  • LongCat-2.5-Preview$13.40
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Step 5 Preview, North Small Translate or LongCat-2.5-Preview?

Step 5 Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 57/100 against LongCat-2.5-Preview (52) and North Small Translate (50). It leads on inputs & features. North Small Translate wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Step 5 Preview, North Small Translate or LongCat-2.5-Preview?

North Small Translate is cheaper at Free input / Free output per million tokens (official Cohere API price). LongCat-2.5-Preview costs $0.75 input / $2.95 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider); Step 5 Preview costs $1.00 input / $2.70 output per million tokens (official StepFun (Global) API price). North Small Translate is listed as free.

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Step 5 Preview has not been scored yet, North Small Translate has not been scored yet and LongCat-2.5-Preview has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Step 5 Preview, North Small Translate and LongCat-2.5-Preview yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that North Small Translate does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

Step 5 Preview and LongCat-2.5-Preview have the largest context windows (1,000,000 and 1,000,000 tokens), against 16,000 for North Small Translate. Maximum output per response: Step 5 Preview up to 1,000,000, North Small Translate up to 16,000, LongCat-2.5-Preview up to 131,072 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Step 5 Preview accepts text, images and video; North Small Translate accepts text; LongCat-2.5-Preview accepts text and images. Step 5 Preview handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

North Small Translate publishes its weights (CC-BY-NC-4.0) and can be self-hosted; Step 5 Preview and LongCat-2.5-Preview is proprietary.

Which is newer?

LongCat-2.5-Preview is the newest, released Sep 25, 2026. Step 5 Preview came out Sep 16, 2026; North Small Translate came out Sep 9, 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.