Step 3.5 Flash vs Mistral Large 3 vs GLM-4.7-FlashX
Too close to call on our weighted score (Step 3.5 Flash 62, GLM-4.7-FlashX 61, Mistral Large 3 50). The right pick depends on what you value most.
StepFunStep 3.5 Flash
62/100- ECI—
- Price$0.10 / $0.30
- Context256K
Mistral AIMistral Large 3
50/100- ECI—
- Price$0.50 / $1.50
- Context262K
Z.ai (Zhipu)GLM-4.7-FlashX
61/100- ECI—
- Price$0.07 / $0.40
- Context200K
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Step 3.5 Flash 62/100, GLM-4.7-FlashX 61/100, Mistral Large 3 50/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Step 3.5 Flash on price and Mistral Large 3 for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceStep 3.5 FlashStep 3.5 Flash $0.15 · GLM-4.7-FlashX $0.152 · Mistral Large 3 $0.75 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMistral Large 3Mistral Large 3 262,144 · Step 3.5 Flash 256,000 · GLM-4.7-FlashX 200,000 tokens
- Widest inputsMistral Large 3Step 3.5 Flash: Text · Mistral Large 3: Text, Images · GLM-4.7-FlashX: Text
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Step 3.5 Flash | Mistral Large 3 | GLM-4.7-FlashX |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 89 | 56 | 89 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 50 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 36 | 37 | 32 |
| Overall | 100% | 62/100 | 50/100 | 61/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Step 3.5 FlashStepFun | Mistral Large 3Mistral AI | GLM-4.7-FlashXZ.ai (Zhipu) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.10 | $0.50 | $0.07 (best) |
| Output | $0.30 (best) | $1.50 | $0.40 |
| Cached input | $0.02 | $0.05 | $0.01 (best) |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.15 (best) | $0.75 | $0.152 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official StepFun (Global) API | Official Mistral API | Official Z.AI API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 256,000 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) | 200,000 tokens |
| Max output | 256,000 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yeslow · high | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Open | Open |
| API model ID | step-3.5-flash | mistral-large-2512 | glm-4.7-flashx |
| API providers | 8 | 13 (best) | 8 |
| Released | Jan 29, 2026 | Dec 2, 2025 | Jan 19, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jan 2025 | Nov 2024 | Apr 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Step 3.5 Flash$1.60
- Mistral Large 3$8.00
- GLM-4.7-FlashX$1.50
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Step 3.5 Flash, Mistral Large 3 or GLM-4.7-FlashX?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Step 3.5 Flash 62/100, GLM-4.7-FlashX 61/100, Mistral Large 3 50/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Step 3.5 Flash on price and Mistral Large 3 for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Step 3.5 Flash, Mistral Large 3 or GLM-4.7-FlashX?
Step 3.5 Flash is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.30 output per million tokens (official StepFun (Global) API price). GLM-4.7-FlashX costs $0.07 input / $0.40 output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price); Mistral Large 3 costs $0.50 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.15 per million tokens for Step 3.5 Flash versus $0.152 for GLM-4.7-FlashX (1× as much) and $0.75 for Mistral Large 3 (5× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Step 3.5 Flash has not been scored yet, Mistral Large 3 has not been scored yet and GLM-4.7-FlashX has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Step 3.5 Flash, Mistral Large 3 and GLM-4.7-FlashX yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Mistral Large 3 has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 256,000 for Step 3.5 Flash and 200,000 for GLM-4.7-FlashX. Maximum output per response: Step 3.5 Flash up to 256,000, Mistral Large 3 up to 262,144, GLM-4.7-FlashX up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Step 3.5 Flash accepts text; Mistral Large 3 accepts text and images; GLM-4.7-FlashX accepts text. Mistral Large 3 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, all three publish their weights, so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Step 3.5 Flash is the newest, released Jan 29, 2026. GLM-4.7-FlashX came out Jan 19, 2026; Mistral Large 3 came out Dec 2, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Step 3.5 Flash Jan 2025, Mistral Large 3 Nov 2024, GLM-4.7-FlashX Apr 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
