ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Step 3.5 Flash 2603 vs Viv Fast vs MiMo-V2.5

MiMo-V2.5 comes out ahead, 79 to 75 and 62 on our weighted score, though Step 3.5 Flash 2603 is 14% cheaper per token.

  1. StepFun

    Step 3.5 Flash 2603

    Released Apr 2, 2026

    62/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.10 / $0.30
    • Context256K
  2. Vivgrid

    Viv Fast

    Released Sep 21, 2026

    75/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.13 / $0.40
    • Context1M
  3. Our pick

    Xiaomi

    MiMo-V2.5

    Released Apr 22, 2026

    79/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.14 / $0.28
    • Context1.05M
01 — Verdict

MiMo-V2.5 is our pick

MiMo-V2.5 is the better all-round choice, scoring 79/100 against Viv Fast (75) and Step 3.5 Flash 2603 (62). It leads on inputs & features. Step 3.5 Flash 2603 wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceStep 3.5 Flash 2603Step 3.5 Flash 2603 $0.15 · MiMo-V2.5 $0.175 · Viv Fast $0.198 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextMiMo-V2.5MiMo-V2.5 1,048,576 · Viv Fast 1,000,000 · Step 3.5 Flash 2603 256,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsMiMo-V2.5Step 3.5 Flash 2603: Text · Viv Fast: Text, Images · MiMo-V2.5: Text, Images, Audio, Video
  • Self-hostingStep 3.5 Flash 2603 and MiMo-V2.5Publishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightStep 3.5 Flash 2603Viv FastMiMo-V2.5
Price50%898386
Inputs & features30%357080
Context window20%366061
Overall100%62/10075/10079/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Step 3.5 Flash 2603 vs Viv Fast vs MiMo-V2.5 specifications side by side
SpecificationStep 3.5 Flash 2603StepFunViv FastVivgridMiMo-V2.5Xiaomi
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.10 (best)$0.13$0.14
Output$0.30$0.40$0.28 (best)
Cached input$0.02$0.05$0.0028 (best)
Blended (3:1)$0.15 (best)$0.198$0.175
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial StepFun (Global) APIOfficial Vivgrid APIOfficial Xiaomi API
Limits
Context window256,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens (best)
Max output256,000 tokens (best)256,000 tokens (best)131,072 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoYesYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoYes
VideoNoNoYes
ReasoningYeslow · highYeslow · high · maxYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoYesNo
Availability
WeightsOpenProprietaryOpen
API model IDstep-3.5-flash-2603viv-fastmimo-v2.5
API providers3121 (best)
ReleasedApr 2, 2026Sep 21, 2026Apr 22, 2026
Knowledge cutoffJan 2025Sep 2026Dec 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Step 3.5 Flash 2603$1.60
  • Viv Fast$2.10
  • MiMo-V2.5$1.96
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Step 3.5 Flash 2603, Viv Fast or MiMo-V2.5?

MiMo-V2.5 is the better all-round choice, scoring 79/100 against Viv Fast (75) and Step 3.5 Flash 2603 (62). It leads on inputs & features. Step 3.5 Flash 2603 wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Step 3.5 Flash 2603, Viv Fast or MiMo-V2.5?

Step 3.5 Flash 2603 is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.30 output per million tokens (official StepFun (Global) API price). MiMo-V2.5 costs $0.14 input / $0.28 output per million tokens (official Xiaomi API price); Viv Fast costs $0.13 input / $0.40 output per million tokens (official Vivgrid API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.15 per million tokens for Step 3.5 Flash 2603 versus $0.175 for MiMo-V2.5 (1.2× as much) and $0.198 for Viv Fast (1.3× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Step 3.5 Flash 2603 has not been scored yet, Viv Fast has not been scored yet and MiMo-V2.5 has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Step 3.5 Flash 2603, Viv Fast and MiMo-V2.5 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

MiMo-V2.5 has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 1,000,000 for Viv Fast and 256,000 for Step 3.5 Flash 2603. Maximum output per response: Step 3.5 Flash 2603 up to 256,000, Viv Fast up to 256,000, MiMo-V2.5 up to 131,072 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Step 3.5 Flash 2603 accepts text; Viv Fast accepts text and images; MiMo-V2.5 accepts text, images, audio and video. MiMo-V2.5 handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Step 3.5 Flash 2603 and MiMo-V2.5 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Viv Fast is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Viv Fast is the newest, released Sep 21, 2026. MiMo-V2.5 came out Apr 22, 2026; Step 3.5 Flash 2603 came out Apr 2, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Step 3.5 Flash 2603 Jan 2025, Viv Fast Sep 2026, MiMo-V2.5 Dec 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.