Step 1 (32K) vs Nova Micro vs Qwen-MT Plus
Nova Micro comes out ahead, 62 to 18 and 12 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
StepFunStep 1 (32K)
18/100- ECI—
- Price$2.05 / $9.59
- Context33K
- Our pick
AmazonNova Micro
62/100- ECI—
- Price$0.035 / $0.14
- Context128K
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen-MT Plus
12/100- ECI—
- Price$2.46 / $7.37
- Context16K
Nova Micro is our pick
Nova Micro is the better all-round choice, scoring 62/100 against Step 1 (32K) (18) and Qwen-MT Plus (12). It leads on price and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceNova MicroNova Micro $0.061 · Qwen-MT Plus $3.69 · Step 1 (32K) $3.94 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextNova MicroNova Micro 128,000 · Step 1 (32K) 32,768 · Qwen-MT Plus 16,384 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsStep 1 (32K): Text · Nova Micro: Text · Qwen-MT Plus: Text
- Self-hostingNo open weightsAll three are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | Step 1 (32K) | Nova Micro | Qwen-MT Plus |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 22 | 100 | 23 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 25 | 25 | 0 |
| Context window | 20% | 0 | 24 | 0 |
| Overall | 100% | 18/100 | 62/100 | 12/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Step 1 (32K)StepFun | Nova MicroAmazon | Qwen-MT PlusAlibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $2.05 | $0.035 (best) | $2.46 |
| Output | $9.59 | $0.14 (best) | $7.37 |
| Cached input | $0.41 | $0.0088 (best) | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.94 | $0.061 (best) | $3.69 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official StepFun (Global) API | Official Amazon Bedrock API | Official Alibaba API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 32,768 tokens | 128,000 tokens (best) | 16,384 tokens |
| Max output | 32,768 tokens (best) | 10,000 tokens | 8,192 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | No |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | step-1-32k | amazon.nova-micro-v1:0 | qwen-mt-plus |
| API providers | 1 | 3 (best) | 1 |
| Released | Jan 1, 2025 | Dec 3, 2024 | Jan 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jun 2024 | Oct 2024 | Apr 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Step 1 (32K)$39.68
- Nova Micro$0.63
- Qwen-MT Plus$39.34
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Step 1 (32K), Nova Micro or Qwen-MT Plus?
Nova Micro is the better all-round choice, scoring 62/100 against Step 1 (32K) (18) and Qwen-MT Plus (12). It leads on price and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Step 1 (32K), Nova Micro or Qwen-MT Plus?
Nova Micro is cheaper at $0.035 input / $0.14 output per million tokens (official Amazon Bedrock API price). Qwen-MT Plus costs $2.46 input / $7.37 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price); Step 1 (32K) costs $2.05 input / $9.59 output per million tokens (official StepFun (Global) API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.061 per million tokens for Nova Micro versus $3.69 for Qwen-MT Plus (60× as much) and $3.94 for Step 1 (32K) (64× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Step 1 (32K) has not been scored yet, Nova Micro has not been scored yet and Qwen-MT Plus has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Step 1 (32K), Nova Micro and Qwen-MT Plus yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Qwen-MT Plus does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Nova Micro has the largest context window at 128,000 tokens, against 32,768 for Step 1 (32K) and 16,384 for Qwen-MT Plus. Maximum output per response: Step 1 (32K) up to 32,768, Nova Micro up to 10,000, Qwen-MT Plus up to 8,192 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Step 1 (32K) accepts text; Nova Micro accepts text; Qwen-MT Plus accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
No. Step 1 (32K), Nova Micro and Qwen-MT Plus are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Step 1 (32K) is the newest, released Jan 1, 2025. Qwen-MT Plus came out Jan 2025; Nova Micro came out Dec 3, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Step 1 (32K) Jun 2024, Nova Micro Oct 2024, Qwen-MT Plus Apr 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
