Claude Sonnet 5 vs GPT-5.4
Too close to call on our weighted score (Claude Sonnet 5 66, GPT-5.4 65). The right pick depends on what you value most.
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 5
66/100- ECI156.3
- Price$2.00 / $10.00
- Context1M
OpenAI
GPT-5.4
65/100- ECI156.9
- Price$2.50 / $15.00
- Context1.05M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Claude Sonnet 5 66/100, GPT-5.4 65/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: GPT-5.4 for raw capability and Claude Sonnet 5 on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityGPT-5.4Capabilities Index (ECI): GPT-5.4 156.9 · Claude Sonnet 5 156.3
- Lowest priceClaude Sonnet 5Claude Sonnet 5 $4.00 · GPT-5.4 $5.63 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGPT-5.4GPT-5.4 1,050,000 · Claude Sonnet 5 1,000,000 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsClaude Sonnet 5: Text, Images, PDFs · GPT-5.4: Text, Images, PDFs
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | Claude Sonnet 5 | GPT-5.4 |
|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 86 | 87 |
| Price | 25% | 21 | 14 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 80 | 80 |
| Context window | 10% | 60 | 61 |
| Overall | 100% | 66/100 | 65/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 156.3 | 156.9 (best) |
| ECI rank | #23 of 148 | #16 of 148 (best) |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 90.5% | 93.3% (best) |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | 65.6% | 78.6% (best) |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 94.7% | 97.8% (best) |
| SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues | — | 76.9% |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 33.7% | 45.1% (best) |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $2.00 (best) | $2.50 |
| Output | $10.00 (best) | $15.00 |
| Cached input | $0.20 (best) | $0.25 |
| Blended (3:1) | $4.00 (best) | $5.63 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Over 272K: $5.00 / $22.50 |
| Price source | Official Anthropic API | Official OpenAI API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,050,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 128,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | Yes | Yes |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh · max | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | claude-sonnet-5 | gpt-5.4 |
| API providers | 38 (best) | 36 |
| Released | Jun 30, 2026 | Mar 5, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Jan 31, 2026 | Aug 31, 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
Claude Sonnet 5$40.00
GPT-5.4$55.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Claude Sonnet 5 or GPT-5.4?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Claude Sonnet 5 66/100, GPT-5.4 65/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: GPT-5.4 for raw capability and Claude Sonnet 5 on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, Claude Sonnet 5 or GPT-5.4?
Claude Sonnet 5 is cheaper at $2.00 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (official Anthropic API price). GPT-5.4 costs $2.50 input / $15.00 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $4.00 per million tokens for Claude Sonnet 5 versus $5.63 for GPT-5.4 (1.4× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
GPT-5.4 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): GPT-5.4 156.9 (#16 of 148) and Claude Sonnet 5 156.3 (#23 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (154.9–159.1 vs 153.6–158.8), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — GPT-5.4 93.3%, Claude Sonnet 5 90.5%; FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 — GPT-5.4 78.6%, Claude Sonnet 5 65.6%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — GPT-5.4 97.8%, Claude Sonnet 5 94.7%; SimpleQA Verified — GPT-5.4 45.1%, Claude Sonnet 5 33.7%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Claude Sonnet 5 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, GPT-5.4 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5.4 has the largest context window at 1,050,000 tokens, against 1,000,000 for Claude Sonnet 5. Maximum output per response: Claude Sonnet 5 up to 128,000, GPT-5.4 up to 128,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Claude Sonnet 5 accepts text, images and PDFs; GPT-5.4 accepts text, images and PDFs. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
No. Claude Sonnet 5 and GPT-5.4 are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Claude Sonnet 5 is the newest, released Jun 30, 2026. GPT-5.4 came out Mar 5, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Claude Sonnet 5 Jan 31, 2026, GPT-5.4 Aug 31, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.