ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Sonar Reasoning Pro vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct vs Qwen Max

Too close to call on our weighted score (Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct 28, Sonar Reasoning Pro 27, Qwen Max 22). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Perplexity

    Sonar Reasoning Pro

    Released Jan 1, 2024

    27/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$2.00 / $8.00
    • Context128K
  2. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

    Released Apr 2025

    28/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.50 / $7.50
    • Context262K
  3. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen Max

    Released Apr 3, 2024

    22/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.60 / $6.40
    • Context33K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct 28/100, Sonar Reasoning Pro 27/100, Qwen Max 22/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen Max on price and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceQwen MaxQwen Max $2.80 · Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct $3.00 · Sonar Reasoning Pro $3.50 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct 262,144 · Sonar Reasoning Pro 128,000 · Qwen Max 32,768 tokens
  • Widest inputsSonar Reasoning ProSonar Reasoning Pro: Text, Images · Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: Text · Qwen Max: Text
  • Self-hostingQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightSonar Reasoning ProQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructQwen Max
Price50%242729
Inputs & features30%352525
Context window20%24370
Overall100%27/10028/10022/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Sonar Reasoning Pro vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct vs Qwen Max specifications side by side
SpecificationSonar Reasoning ProPerplexityQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructAlibaba (Qwen)Qwen MaxAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$2.00$1.50 (best)$1.60
Output$8.00$7.50$6.40 (best)
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$3.50$3.00$2.80 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateOver 32K: $2.70 / $13.50Same rate
Price sourceOfficial Perplexity APIOfficial Alibaba APIOfficial Alibaba API
Limits
Context window128,000 tokens262,144 tokens (best)32,768 tokens
Max output4,096 tokens65,536 tokens (best)8,192 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesNoNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningYesminimal · low · medium · highNoNo
Tool callingNoYesYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenProprietary
API model IDsonar-reasoning-proqwen3-coder-480b-a35b-instructqwen-max
API providers47 (best)6
ReleasedJan 1, 2024Apr 2025Apr 3, 2024
Knowledge cutoffSep 1, 2025Apr 2025Apr 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Sonar Reasoning Pro$36.00
  • Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct$30.00
  • Qwen Max$28.80
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Sonar Reasoning Pro, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct or Qwen Max?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct 28/100, Sonar Reasoning Pro 27/100, Qwen Max 22/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen Max on price and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Sonar Reasoning Pro, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct or Qwen Max?

Qwen Max is cheaper at $1.60 input / $6.40 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct costs $1.50 input / $7.50 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price); Sonar Reasoning Pro costs $2.00 input / $8.00 output per million tokens (official Perplexity API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $2.80 per million tokens for Qwen Max versus $3.00 for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct (1.1× as much) and $3.50 for Sonar Reasoning Pro (1.3× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Sonar Reasoning Pro has not been scored yet, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has not been scored yet and Qwen Max has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Sonar Reasoning Pro, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct and Qwen Max yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Sonar Reasoning Pro does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 128,000 for Sonar Reasoning Pro and 32,768 for Qwen Max. Maximum output per response: Sonar Reasoning Pro up to 4,096, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct up to 65,536, Qwen Max up to 8,192 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Sonar Reasoning Pro accepts text and images; Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct accepts text; Qwen Max accepts text. Sonar Reasoning Pro handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Sonar Reasoning Pro and Qwen Max is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the newest, released Apr 2025. Qwen Max came out Apr 3, 2024; Sonar Reasoning Pro came out Jan 1, 2024. Knowledge cutoff: Sonar Reasoning Pro Sep 1, 2025, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct Apr 2025, Qwen Max Apr 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.