Solar Pro 3 vs Qwen-MT Turbo vs Jamba Mini
Too close to call on our weighted score (Jamba Mini 57, Solar Pro 3 55, Qwen-MT Turbo 40). The right pick depends on what you value most.
Upstage
Solar Pro 3
55/100- ECI—
- Price$0.25 / $0.25
- Context131K
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen-MT Turbo
40/100- ECI—
- Price$0.16 / $0.49
- Context16K
AI21 LabsJamba Mini
57/100- ECI—
- Price$0.20 / $0.40
- Context256K
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Jamba Mini 57/100, Solar Pro 3 55/100, Qwen-MT Turbo 40/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen-MT Turbo on price and Jamba Mini for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceQwen-MT TurboQwen-MT Turbo $0.242 · Solar Pro 3 $0.25 · Jamba Mini $0.25 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextJamba MiniJamba Mini 256,000 · Solar Pro 3 131,072 · Qwen-MT Turbo 16,384 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsSolar Pro 3: Text · Qwen-MT Turbo: Text · Jamba Mini: Text
- Self-hostingJamba MiniPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Solar Pro 3 | Qwen-MT Turbo | Jamba Mini |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 78 | 79 | 78 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 0 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 0 | 36 |
| Overall | 100% | 55/100 | 40/100 | 57/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Solar Pro 3Upstage | Qwen-MT TurboAlibaba (Qwen) | Jamba MiniAI21 Labs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.25 | $0.16 (best) | $0.20 |
| Output | $0.25 (best) | $0.49 | $0.40 |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.25 | $0.242 (best) | $0.25 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Upstage API | Official Alibaba API | Official AI21 Labs API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens | 16,384 tokens | 256,000 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 8,192 tokens (best) | 8,192 tokens (best) | 4,096 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yeslow · medium · high | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | No | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | Yes |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | solar-pro3 | qwen-mt-turbo | jamba-mini |
| API providers | 2 (best) | 1 | 1 |
| Released | Jan 2026 | Jan 2025 | Jan 1, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Mar 2025 | Apr 2024 | Aug 22, 2024 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Solar Pro 3$3.00
- Qwen-MT Turbo$2.58
- Jamba Mini$2.80
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Solar Pro 3, Qwen-MT Turbo or Jamba Mini?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Jamba Mini 57/100, Solar Pro 3 55/100, Qwen-MT Turbo 40/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen-MT Turbo on price and Jamba Mini for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Solar Pro 3, Qwen-MT Turbo or Jamba Mini?
Qwen-MT Turbo is cheaper at $0.16 input / $0.49 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). Solar Pro 3 costs $0.25 input / $0.25 output per million tokens (official Upstage API price); Jamba Mini costs $0.20 input / $0.40 output per million tokens (official AI21 Labs API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.242 per million tokens for Qwen-MT Turbo versus $0.25 for Solar Pro 3 (1× as much) and $0.25 for Jamba Mini (1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Solar Pro 3 has not been scored yet, Qwen-MT Turbo has not been scored yet and Jamba Mini has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Solar Pro 3, Qwen-MT Turbo and Jamba Mini yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Qwen-MT Turbo does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Jamba Mini has the largest context window at 256,000 tokens, against 131,072 for Solar Pro 3 and 16,384 for Qwen-MT Turbo. Maximum output per response: Solar Pro 3 up to 8,192, Qwen-MT Turbo up to 8,192, Jamba Mini up to 4,096 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Solar Pro 3 accepts text; Qwen-MT Turbo accepts text; Jamba Mini accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Jamba Mini publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Solar Pro 3 and Qwen-MT Turbo is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Solar Pro 3 is the newest, released Jan 2026. Jamba Mini came out Jan 1, 2026; Qwen-MT Turbo came out Jan 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Solar Pro 3 Mar 2025, Qwen-MT Turbo Apr 2024, Jamba Mini Aug 22, 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
