Solar Pro 3 vs Jamba Mini vs GLM-4.6V-Flash
GLM-4.6V-Flash comes out ahead, 65 to 57 and 55 on our weighted score.
Upstage
Solar Pro 3
55/100- ECI—
- Price$0.25 / $0.25
- Context131K
AI21 LabsJamba Mini
57/100- ECI—
- Price$0.20 / $0.40
- Context256K
- Our pick
Z.ai (Zhipu)GLM-4.6V-Flash
65/100- ECI—
- Price$0.161 / $0.559
- Context128K
GLM-4.6V-Flash is our pick
GLM-4.6V-Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 65/100 against Jamba Mini (57) and Solar Pro 3 (55). It leads on inputs & features. Jamba Mini wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceSolar Pro 3 and Jamba MiniSolar Pro 3 $0.25 · Jamba Mini $0.25 · GLM-4.6V-Flash $0.261 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextJamba MiniJamba Mini 256,000 · Solar Pro 3 131,072 · GLM-4.6V-Flash 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsGLM-4.6V-FlashSolar Pro 3: Text · Jamba Mini: Text · GLM-4.6V-Flash: Text, Images, Video
- Self-hostingJamba Mini and GLM-4.6V-FlashPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Solar Pro 3 | Jamba Mini | GLM-4.6V-Flash |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 78 | 78 | 78 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 35 | 70 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 36 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 55/100 | 57/100 | 65/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Solar Pro 3Upstage | Jamba MiniAI21 Labs | GLM-4.6V-FlashZ.ai (Zhipu) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.25 | $0.20 | $0.161 (best) |
| Output | $0.25 (best) | $0.40 | $0.559 |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.25 (best) | $0.25 (best) | $0.261 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Upstage API | Official AI21 Labs API | Median of 2 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens | 256,000 tokens (best) | 128,000 tokens |
| Max output | 8,192 tokens | 4,096 tokens | 32,768 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | Yeslow · medium · high | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open | Open |
| API model ID | solar-pro3 | jamba-mini | glm-4.6v-flash |
| API providers | 2 | 1 | 6 (best) |
| Released | Jan 2026 | Jan 1, 2026 | Dec 8, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Mar 2025 | Aug 22, 2024 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Solar Pro 3$3.00
- Jamba Mini$2.80
- GLM-4.6V-Flash$2.73
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Solar Pro 3, Jamba Mini or GLM-4.6V-Flash?
GLM-4.6V-Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 65/100 against Jamba Mini (57) and Solar Pro 3 (55). It leads on inputs & features. Jamba Mini wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Solar Pro 3, Jamba Mini or GLM-4.6V-Flash?
Solar Pro 3 is cheaper at $0.25 input / $0.25 output per million tokens (official Upstage API price). Jamba Mini costs $0.20 input / $0.40 output per million tokens (official AI21 Labs API price); GLM-4.6V-Flash costs $0.161 input / $0.559 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers; free on Z.AI). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.25 per million tokens for Solar Pro 3 versus $0.25 for Jamba Mini (1× as much) and $0.261 for GLM-4.6V-Flash (1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Solar Pro 3 has not been scored yet, Jamba Mini has not been scored yet and GLM-4.6V-Flash has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Solar Pro 3, Jamba Mini and GLM-4.6V-Flash yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Jamba Mini has the largest context window at 256,000 tokens, against 131,072 for Solar Pro 3 and 128,000 for GLM-4.6V-Flash. Maximum output per response: Solar Pro 3 up to 8,192, Jamba Mini up to 4,096, GLM-4.6V-Flash up to 32,768 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Solar Pro 3 accepts text; Jamba Mini accepts text; GLM-4.6V-Flash accepts text, images and video. GLM-4.6V-Flash handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Jamba Mini and GLM-4.6V-Flash publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Solar Pro 3 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Solar Pro 3 is the newest, released Jan 2026. Jamba Mini came out Jan 1, 2026; GLM-4.6V-Flash came out Dec 8, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Solar Pro 3 Mar 2025, Jamba Mini Aug 22, 2024.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
