Solar Pro 2 vs Muse Glimmer 30B
Muse Glimmer 30B comes out ahead, 57 to 52 on our weighted score, though Solar Pro 2 is 2.1× cheaper per token.
Upstage
Solar Pro 2
52/100- ECI—
- Price$0.25 / $0.25
- Context66K
- Our pick
MetaMuse Glimmer 30B
57/100- ECI—
- Price$0.30 / $1.20
- Context131K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Muse Glimmer 30B is our pick
Muse Glimmer 30B is the better all-round choice, scoring 57/100 against Solar Pro 2 (52). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Solar Pro 2 wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceSolar Pro 2Solar Pro 2 $0.25 · Muse Glimmer 30B $0.525 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMuse Glimmer 30BMuse Glimmer 30B 131,072 · Solar Pro 2 65,536 tokens
- Widest inputsMuse Glimmer 30BSolar Pro 2: Text · Muse Glimmer 30B: Text, Images
- Self-hostingMuse Glimmer 30BPublishes downloadable weights (Apache 2.0)
| Measure | Weight | Solar Pro 2 | Muse Glimmer 30B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 78 | 63 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 70 |
| Context window | 20% | 12 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 52/100 | 57/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Solar Pro 2Upstage | Muse Glimmer 30BMeta |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.25 (best) | $0.30 |
| Output | $0.25 (best) | $1.20 |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.25 (best) | $0.525 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Upstage API | Median of 10 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 65,536 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 8,192 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yesminimal · high | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | OpenApache 2.0 |
| API model ID | solar-pro2 | — |
| API providers | 2 | 12 (best) |
| Released | May 20, 2025 | Aug 10, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Mar 2025 | Jan 4, 2026 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Solar Pro 2$3.00
- Muse Glimmer 30B$5.40
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Solar Pro 2 or Muse Glimmer 30B?
Muse Glimmer 30B is the better all-round choice, scoring 57/100 against Solar Pro 2 (52). It leads on inputs & features and context window. Solar Pro 2 wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Solar Pro 2 or Muse Glimmer 30B?
Solar Pro 2 is cheaper at $0.25 input / $0.25 output per million tokens (official Upstage API price). Muse Glimmer 30B costs $0.30 input / $1.20 output per million tokens (median across 10 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.25 per million tokens for Solar Pro 2 versus $0.525 for Muse Glimmer 30B (2.1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Solar Pro 2 has not been scored yet and Muse Glimmer 30B has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Solar Pro 2 and Muse Glimmer 30B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Muse Glimmer 30B has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 65,536 for Solar Pro 2. Maximum output per response: Solar Pro 2 up to 8,192, Muse Glimmer 30B up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Solar Pro 2 accepts text; Muse Glimmer 30B accepts text and images. Muse Glimmer 30B handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Muse Glimmer 30B publishes its weights (Apache 2.0) and can be self-hosted; Solar Pro 2 is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Muse Glimmer 30B is the newest, released Aug 10, 2026. Solar Pro 2 came out May 20, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Solar Pro 2 Mar 2025, Muse Glimmer 30B Jan 4, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
