ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Motif 3

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning comes out ahead, 69 to 57 and 44 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. ByteDance Seed

    Seed 2.1 Turbo

    Released Jun 23, 2026

    57/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.445 / $2.23
    • Context256K
  2. Our pick

    NVIDIA

    Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning

    Released Apr 28, 2026

    69/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.25 / $0.85
    • Context256K
  3. Motif Technologies

    Motif 3

    Released Aug 7, 2026

    44/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.50 / $2.00
    • Context262K
01 — Verdict

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning is our pick

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning is the better all-round choice, scoring 69/100 against Seed 2.1 Turbo (57) and Motif 3 (44). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B ReasoningNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning $0.40 · Motif 3 $0.875 · Seed 2.1 Turbo $0.891 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextMotif 3Motif 3 262,144 · Seed 2.1 Turbo 256,000 · Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning 256,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B ReasoningSeed 2.1 Turbo: Text, Images, Video · Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning: Text, Images, Audio, Video · Motif 3: Text
  • Self-hostingNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning and Motif 3Publishes downloadable weights (MIT)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightSeed 2.1 TurboNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B ReasoningMotif 3
Price50%526953
Inputs & features30%809035
Context window20%363637
Overall100%57/10069/10044/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Seed 2.1 Turbo vs Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning vs Motif 3 specifications side by side
SpecificationSeed 2.1 TurboByteDance SeedNemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B ReasoningNVIDIAMotif 3Motif Technologies
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.445$0.25 (best)$0.50
Output$2.23$0.85 (best)$2.00
Cached input$0.089——
Blended (3:1)$0.891$0.40 (best)$0.875
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Volcengine Ark APIMedian of 4 providersMedian of 1 providers
Limits
Context window256,000 tokens256,000 tokens262,144 tokens (best)
Max output256,000 tokens65,536 tokens262,144 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoYesNo
VideoYesYesNo
ReasoningYesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · maxYesYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesYesNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenOpenMIT
API model IDdoubao-seed-2-1-turbo-260628nvidia/nemotron-3-nano-omni-30b-a3b-reasoning—
API providers48 (best)1
ReleasedJun 23, 2026Apr 28, 2026Aug 7, 2026
Knowledge cutoff———
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Seed 2.1 Turbo$8.91
  • Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning$4.20
  • Motif 3$9.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Seed 2.1 Turbo, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning or Motif 3?

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning is the better all-round choice, scoring 69/100 against Seed 2.1 Turbo (57) and Motif 3 (44). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Seed 2.1 Turbo, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning or Motif 3?

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning is cheaper at $0.25 input / $0.85 output per million tokens (median across 4 API providers; free on Nvidia). Motif 3 costs $0.50 input / $2.00 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider); Seed 2.1 Turbo costs $0.445 input / $2.23 output per million tokens (official Volcengine Ark API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.40 per million tokens for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning versus $0.875 for Motif 3 (2.2× as much) and $0.891 for Seed 2.1 Turbo (2.2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Seed 2.1 Turbo has not been scored yet, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning has not been scored yet and Motif 3 has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Seed 2.1 Turbo, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning and Motif 3 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Motif 3 has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 256,000 for Seed 2.1 Turbo and 256,000 for Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning. Maximum output per response: Seed 2.1 Turbo up to 256,000, Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning up to 65,536, Motif 3 up to 262,144 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Seed 2.1 Turbo accepts text, images and video; Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning accepts text, images, audio and video; Motif 3 accepts text. Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning and Motif 3 publishes its weights (MIT) and can be self-hosted; Seed 2.1 Turbo is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Motif 3 is the newest, released Aug 7, 2026. Seed 2.1 Turbo came out Jun 23, 2026; Nemotron 3 Nano Omni 30B A3B Reasoning came out Apr 28, 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.