Seed 2.1 Pro vs Step 3.5 Flash 2603
Step 3.5 Flash 2603 comes out ahead, 62 to 50 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
ByteDance SeedSeed 2.1 Pro
50/100- ECI—
- Price$0.891 / $4.45
- Context256K
- Our pick
StepFunStep 3.5 Flash 2603
62/100- ECI—
- Price$0.10 / $0.30
- Context256K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Step 3.5 Flash 2603 is our pick
Step 3.5 Flash 2603 is the better all-round choice, scoring 62/100 against Seed 2.1 Pro (50). It leads on price. Seed 2.1 Pro wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceStep 3.5 Flash 2603Step 3.5 Flash 2603 $0.15 · Seed 2.1 Pro $1.78 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextAbout the sameSeed 2.1 Pro 256,000 · Step 3.5 Flash 2603 256,000 tokens
- Widest inputsSeed 2.1 ProSeed 2.1 Pro: Text, Images, Video · Step 3.5 Flash 2603: Text
- Self-hostingStep 3.5 Flash 2603Publishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Seed 2.1 Pro | Step 3.5 Flash 2603 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 38 | 89 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 80 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 36 | 36 |
| Overall | 100% | 50/100 | 62/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed | Step 3.5 Flash 2603StepFun |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.891 | $0.10 (best) |
| Output | $4.45 | $0.30 (best) |
| Cached input | $0.178 | $0.02 (best) |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.78 | $0.15 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Volcengine Ark API | Official StepFun (Global) API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 256,000 tokens | 256,000 tokens |
| Max output | 256,000 tokens | 256,000 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · max | Yeslow · high |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | doubao-seed-2-1-pro-260628 | step-3.5-flash-2603 |
| API providers | 2 | 3 (best) |
| Released | Jun 23, 2026 | Apr 2, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Jan 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Seed 2.1 Pro$17.81
- Step 3.5 Flash 2603$1.60
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Seed 2.1 Pro or Step 3.5 Flash 2603?
Step 3.5 Flash 2603 is the better all-round choice, scoring 62/100 against Seed 2.1 Pro (50). It leads on price. Seed 2.1 Pro wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Seed 2.1 Pro or Step 3.5 Flash 2603?
Step 3.5 Flash 2603 is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.30 output per million tokens (official StepFun (Global) API price). Seed 2.1 Pro costs $0.891 input / $4.45 output per million tokens (official Volcengine Ark API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.15 per million tokens for Step 3.5 Flash 2603 versus $1.78 for Seed 2.1 Pro (12× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Seed 2.1 Pro has not been scored yet and Step 3.5 Flash 2603 has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Seed 2.1 Pro and Step 3.5 Flash 2603 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Seed 2.1 Pro and Step 3.5 Flash 2603 share the same 256,000-token context window. Maximum output per response: Seed 2.1 Pro up to 256,000, Step 3.5 Flash 2603 up to 256,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Seed 2.1 Pro accepts text, images and video; Step 3.5 Flash 2603 accepts text. Seed 2.1 Pro handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Step 3.5 Flash 2603 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Seed 2.1 Pro is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Seed 2.1 Pro is the newest, released Jun 23, 2026. Step 3.5 Flash 2603 came out Apr 2, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Step 3.5 Flash 2603 Jan 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
