Seed 2.0 Pro vs Trendyol Asure 12B vs MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed
Too close to call on our weighted score (Seed 2.0 Pro 57, Trendyol Asure 12B 54, MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed 41). The right pick depends on what you value most.
ByteDance SeedSeed 2.0 Pro
57/100- ECI—
- Price$0.475 / $2.37
- Context256K
Trendyol
Trendyol Asure 12B
54/100- ECI—
- Price$0.10 / $0.50
- Context131K
MiniMaxMiniMax-M2.5-highspeed
41/100- ECI—
- Price$0.60 / $2.40
- Context205K
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 3 points (Seed 2.0 Pro 57/100, Trendyol Asure 12B 54/100, MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed 41/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Trendyol Asure 12B on price and Seed 2.0 Pro for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceTrendyol Asure 12BTrendyol Asure 12B $0.20 · Seed 2.0 Pro $0.95 · MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed $1.05 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextSeed 2.0 ProSeed 2.0 Pro 256,000 · MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed 204,800 · Trendyol Asure 12B 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsSeed 2.0 ProSeed 2.0 Pro: Text, Images, Video · Trendyol Asure 12B: Text, Images · MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed: Text
- Self-hostingTrendyol Asure 12B and MiniMax-M2.5-highspeedPublishes downloadable weights (Gemma)
| Measure | Weight | Seed 2.0 Pro | Trendyol Asure 12B | MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 51 | 83 | 49 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 80 | 25 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 36 | 24 | 32 |
| Overall | 100% | 57/100 | 54/100 | 41/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Seed 2.0 ProByteDance Seed | Trendyol Asure 12BTrendyol | MiniMax-M2.5-highspeedMiniMax |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.475 | $0.10 (best) | $0.60 |
| Output | $2.37 | $0.50 (best) | $2.40 |
| Cached input | $0.095 | — | $0.06 (best) |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.95 | $0.20 (best) | $1.05 |
| Long-context rate | Over 32K: $0.712 / $3.56 | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Volcengine Ark API | Median of 1 providers | Official MiniMax (minimax.io) API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 256,000 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens | 204,800 tokens |
| Max output | 128,000 tokens | — | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | Yes | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · max | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | No | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | OpenGemma | Open |
| API model ID | doubao-seed-2-0-pro-260215 | — | MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed |
| API providers | 5 | 1 | 7 (best) |
| Released | Feb 14, 2026 | Feb 19, 2026 | Feb 13, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Seed 2.0 Pro$9.50
- Trendyol Asure 12B$2.00
- MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed$10.80
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Seed 2.0 Pro, Trendyol Asure 12B or MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 3 points (Seed 2.0 Pro 57/100, Trendyol Asure 12B 54/100, MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed 41/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Trendyol Asure 12B on price and Seed 2.0 Pro for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Pro, Trendyol Asure 12B or MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed?
Trendyol Asure 12B is cheaper at $0.10 input / $0.50 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Seed 2.0 Pro costs $0.475 input / $2.37 output per million tokens (official Volcengine Ark API price); MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed costs $0.60 input / $2.40 output per million tokens (official MiniMax (minimax.io) API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.20 per million tokens for Trendyol Asure 12B versus $0.95 for Seed 2.0 Pro (4.7× as much) and $1.05 for MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed (5.3× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Seed 2.0 Pro has not been scored yet, Trendyol Asure 12B has not been scored yet and MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Seed 2.0 Pro, Trendyol Asure 12B and MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that Trendyol Asure 12B does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Seed 2.0 Pro has the largest context window at 256,000 tokens, against 204,800 for MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed and 131,072 for Trendyol Asure 12B. Maximum output per response: Seed 2.0 Pro up to 128,000, MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Seed 2.0 Pro accepts text, images and video; Trendyol Asure 12B accepts text and images; MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed accepts text. Seed 2.0 Pro handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Trendyol Asure 12B and MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed publishes its weights (Gemma) and can be self-hosted; Seed 2.0 Pro is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Trendyol Asure 12B is the newest, released Feb 19, 2026. Seed 2.0 Pro came out Feb 14, 2026; MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed came out Feb 13, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
