ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Seed 2.0 Mini vs Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ministral 3 3B

Seed 2.0 Mini comes out ahead, 80 to 76 and 74 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.

  1. Our pick

    ByteDance Seed

    Seed 2.0 Mini

    Released Feb 14, 2026

    80/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.03 / $0.297
    • Context256K
  2. Google

    Gemma 4 E4B IT

    Released Apr 2, 2026

    76/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.11 / $0.15
    • Context131K
  3. Mistral AI

    Ministral 3 3B

    Released Dec 2, 2025

    74/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.10 / $0.10
    • Context262K
01 — Verdict

Seed 2.0 Mini is our pick

Seed 2.0 Mini is the better all-round choice, scoring 80/100 against Gemma 4 E4B IT (76) and Ministral 3 3B (74). The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceSeed 2.0 MiniSeed 2.0 Mini $0.097 · Ministral 3 3B $0.10 · Gemma 4 E4B IT $0.12 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextMinistral 3 3BMinistral 3 3B 262,144 · Seed 2.0 Mini 256,000 · Gemma 4 E4B IT 131,072 tokens
  • Widest inputsSeed 2.0 Mini and Gemma 4 E4B ITSeed 2.0 Mini: Text, Images, Video · Gemma 4 E4B IT: Text, Images, Audio · Ministral 3 3B: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingGemma 4 E4B IT and Ministral 3 3BPublishes downloadable weights (Apache 2.0)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightSeed 2.0 MiniGemma 4 E4B ITMinistral 3 3B
Price50%989497
Inputs & features30%808060
Context window20%362437
Overall100%80/10076/10074/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Seed 2.0 Mini vs Gemma 4 E4B IT vs Ministral 3 3B specifications side by side
SpecificationSeed 2.0 MiniByteDance SeedGemma 4 E4B ITGoogleMinistral 3 3BMistral AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.03 (best)$0.11$0.10
Output$0.297$0.15$0.10 (best)
Cached input$0.0059——
Blended (3:1)$0.097 (best)$0.12$0.10
Long-context rateOver 32K: $0.059 / $0.594Same rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Volcengine Ark APIMedian of 2 providersMedian of 1 providers
Limits
Context window256,000 tokens131,072 tokens262,144 tokens (best)
Max output32,000 tokens8,192 tokens262,144 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoYesNo
VideoYesNoNo
ReasoningYesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · maxYesNo
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesYesYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenOpenApache 2.0
API model IDdoubao-seed-2-0-mini-260428——
API providers8 (best)21
ReleasedFeb 14, 2026Apr 2, 2026Dec 2, 2025
Knowledge cutoff———
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Seed 2.0 Mini$0.891
  • Gemma 4 E4B IT$1.40
  • Ministral 3 3B$1.20
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Seed 2.0 Mini, Gemma 4 E4B IT or Ministral 3 3B?

Seed 2.0 Mini is the better all-round choice, scoring 80/100 against Gemma 4 E4B IT (76) and Ministral 3 3B (74). The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Mini, Gemma 4 E4B IT or Ministral 3 3B?

Seed 2.0 Mini is cheaper at $0.03 input / $0.297 output per million tokens (official Volcengine Ark API price). Ministral 3 3B costs $0.10 input / $0.10 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider); Gemma 4 E4B IT costs $0.11 input / $0.15 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.097 per million tokens for Seed 2.0 Mini versus $0.10 for Ministral 3 3B (1× as much) and $0.12 for Gemma 4 E4B IT (1.2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Seed 2.0 Mini has not been scored yet, Gemma 4 E4B IT has not been scored yet and Ministral 3 3B has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Seed 2.0 Mini, Gemma 4 E4B IT and Ministral 3 3B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Ministral 3 3B has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 256,000 for Seed 2.0 Mini and 131,072 for Gemma 4 E4B IT. Maximum output per response: Seed 2.0 Mini up to 32,000, Gemma 4 E4B IT up to 8,192, Ministral 3 3B up to 262,144 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Seed 2.0 Mini accepts text, images and video; Gemma 4 E4B IT accepts text, images and audio; Ministral 3 3B accepts text and images. Seed 2.0 Mini handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Gemma 4 E4B IT and Ministral 3 3B publishes its weights (Apache 2.0) and can be self-hosted; Seed 2.0 Mini is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Gemma 4 E4B IT is the newest, released Apr 2, 2026. Seed 2.0 Mini came out Feb 14, 2026; Ministral 3 3B came out Dec 2, 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.