Seed 2.0 Code vs Motif 3
Seed 2.0 Code comes out ahead, 57 to 44 on our weighted score, though Motif 3 is 8% cheaper per token.
- Our pick
ByteDance SeedSeed 2.0 Code
57/100- ECI—
- Price$0.475 / $2.37
- Context262K
Motif Technologies
Motif 3
44/100- ECI—
- Price$0.50 / $2.00
- Context262K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Seed 2.0 Code is our pick
Seed 2.0 Code is the better all-round choice, scoring 57/100 against Motif 3 (44). It leads on inputs & features. Motif 3 wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceMotif 3Motif 3 $0.875 · Seed 2.0 Code $0.95 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextAbout the sameSeed 2.0 Code 262,144 · Motif 3 262,144 tokens
- Widest inputsSeed 2.0 CodeSeed 2.0 Code: Text, Images, Video · Motif 3: Text
- Self-hostingMotif 3Publishes downloadable weights (MIT)
| Measure | Weight | Seed 2.0 Code | Motif 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 51 | 53 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 80 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 37 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 57/100 | 44/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Seed 2.0 CodeByteDance Seed | Motif 3Motif Technologies |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.475 (best) | $0.50 |
| Output | $2.37 | $2.00 (best) |
| Cached input | $0.095 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.95 | $0.875 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Over 32K: $0.712 / $3.56 | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Volcengine Ark API | Median of 1 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · max | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | OpenMIT |
| API model ID | doubao-seed-2-0-code-preview-260215 | — |
| API providers | 10 (best) | 1 |
| Released | Feb 14, 2026 | Aug 7, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Seed 2.0 Code$9.50
- Motif 3$9.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Seed 2.0 Code or Motif 3?
Seed 2.0 Code is the better all-round choice, scoring 57/100 against Motif 3 (44). It leads on inputs & features. Motif 3 wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Code or Motif 3?
Motif 3 is cheaper at $0.50 input / $2.00 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Seed 2.0 Code costs $0.475 input / $2.37 output per million tokens (official Volcengine Ark API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.875 per million tokens for Motif 3 versus $0.95 for Seed 2.0 Code (1.1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Seed 2.0 Code has not been scored yet and Motif 3 has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Seed 2.0 Code and Motif 3 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Seed 2.0 Code and Motif 3 share the same 262,144-token context window. Maximum output per response: Seed 2.0 Code up to 131,072, Motif 3 up to 262,144 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Seed 2.0 Code accepts text, images and video; Motif 3 accepts text. Seed 2.0 Code handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Motif 3 publishes its weights (MIT) and can be self-hosted; Seed 2.0 Code is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Motif 3 is the newest, released Aug 7, 2026. Seed 2.0 Code came out Feb 14, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
