Seed 2.0 Code vs Granite-4.0-H-Micro
Granite-4.0-H-Micro comes out ahead, 65 to 57 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
ByteDance SeedSeed 2.0 Code
57/100- ECI—
- Price$0.475 / $2.37
- Context262K
- Our pick
IBMGranite-4.0-H-Micro
65/100- ECI—
- Price$0.017 / $0.112
- Context131K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Granite-4.0-H-Micro is our pick
Granite-4.0-H-Micro is the better all-round choice, scoring 65/100 against Seed 2.0 Code (57). It leads on price. Seed 2.0 Code wins on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceGranite-4.0-H-MicroGranite-4.0-H-Micro $0.041 · Seed 2.0 Code $0.95 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextSeed 2.0 CodeSeed 2.0 Code 262,144 · Granite-4.0-H-Micro 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsSeed 2.0 CodeSeed 2.0 Code: Text, Images, Video · Granite-4.0-H-Micro: Text
- Self-hostingGranite-4.0-H-MicroPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Seed 2.0 Code | Granite-4.0-H-Micro |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 51 | 100 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 80 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 37 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 57/100 | 65/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Seed 2.0 CodeByteDance Seed | Granite-4.0-H-MicroIBM |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.475 | $0.017 (best) |
| Output | $2.37 | $0.112 (best) |
| Cached input | $0.095 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.95 | $0.041 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Over 32K: $0.712 / $3.56 | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Volcengine Ark API | Median of 1 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · max | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | doubao-seed-2-0-code-preview-260215 | — |
| API providers | 10 (best) | 1 |
| Released | Feb 14, 2026 | Oct 2, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Seed 2.0 Code$9.50
- Granite-4.0-H-Micro$0.394
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Seed 2.0 Code or Granite-4.0-H-Micro?
Granite-4.0-H-Micro is the better all-round choice, scoring 65/100 against Seed 2.0 Code (57). It leads on price. Seed 2.0 Code wins on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Code or Granite-4.0-H-Micro?
Granite-4.0-H-Micro is cheaper at $0.017 input / $0.112 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Seed 2.0 Code costs $0.475 input / $2.37 output per million tokens (official Volcengine Ark API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.041 per million tokens for Granite-4.0-H-Micro versus $0.95 for Seed 2.0 Code (23× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Seed 2.0 Code has not been scored yet and Granite-4.0-H-Micro has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Seed 2.0 Code and Granite-4.0-H-Micro yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Seed 2.0 Code has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 131,072 for Granite-4.0-H-Micro. Maximum output per response: Seed 2.0 Code up to 131,072, Granite-4.0-H-Micro up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Seed 2.0 Code accepts text, images and video; Granite-4.0-H-Micro accepts text. Seed 2.0 Code handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Granite-4.0-H-Micro publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Seed 2.0 Code is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Seed 2.0 Code is the newest, released Feb 14, 2026. Granite-4.0-H-Micro came out Oct 2, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add MiniMax-M2.5-highspeedThree-way comparison
- Seed 2.0 Code vs MiniMax-M2.5-highspeedMiniMax
- Seed 2.0 Code vs DeepSeek OCR 2DeepSeek
- Seed 2.0 Code vs Qwen3.5 27BAlibaba (Qwen)
- Seed 2.0 Code vs Nova 2 LiteAmazon
- Granite-4.0-H-Micro vs Voxtral Mini 3B 2507Mistral AI
- Granite-4.0-H-Micro vs Sarvam 30BSarvam AI
