Seed 2.0 Code vs GPT-5.4 nano vs MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed
GPT-5.4 nano comes out ahead, 63 to 57 and 41 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
ByteDance SeedSeed 2.0 Code
57/100- ECI—
- Price$0.475 / $2.37
- Context262K
- Our pick
OpenAIGPT-5.4 nano
63/100- ECI145.8
- Price$0.20 / $1.25
- Context400K
MiniMaxMiniMax-M2.5-highspeed
41/100- ECI—
- Price$0.60 / $2.40
- Context205K
GPT-5.4 nano is our pick
GPT-5.4 nano is the better all-round choice, scoring 63/100 against Seed 2.0 Code (57) and MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed (41). It leads on price and context window. Seed 2.0 Code wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceGPT-5.4 nanoGPT-5.4 nano $0.463 · Seed 2.0 Code $0.95 · MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed $1.05 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGPT-5.4 nanoGPT-5.4 nano 400,000 · Seed 2.0 Code 262,144 · MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed 204,800 tokens
- Widest inputsSeed 2.0 CodeSeed 2.0 Code: Text, Images, Video · GPT-5.4 nano: Text, Images · MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed: Text
- Self-hostingMiniMax-M2.5-highspeedPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Seed 2.0 Code | GPT-5.4 nano | MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 51 | 66 | 49 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 80 | 70 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 37 | 44 | 32 |
| Overall | 100% | 57/100 | 63/100 | 41/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Seed 2.0 CodeByteDance Seed | GPT-5.4 nanoOpenAI | MiniMax-M2.5-highspeedMiniMax |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | 145.8 | — |
| ECI rank | — | #75 of 148 | — |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | — | 78.5% | — |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | — | 44.9% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | — | 87.8% | — |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | — | 11.7% | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.475 | $0.20 (best) | $0.60 |
| Output | $2.37 | $1.25 (best) | $2.40 |
| Cached input | $0.095 | $0.02 (best) | $0.06 |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.95 | $0.463 (best) | $1.05 |
| Long-context rate | Over 32K: $0.712 / $3.56 | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Volcengine Ark API | Official OpenAI API | Official MiniMax (minimax.io) API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens | 400,000 tokens (best) | 204,800 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens (best) | 128,000 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | Yes | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · max | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | doubao-seed-2-0-code-preview-260215 | gpt-5.4-nano | MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed |
| API providers | 10 | 26 (best) | 7 |
| Released | Feb 14, 2026 | Mar 17, 2026 | Feb 13, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Aug 31, 2025 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Seed 2.0 Code$9.50
- GPT-5.4 nano$4.50
- MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed$10.80
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Seed 2.0 Code, GPT-5.4 nano or MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed?
GPT-5.4 nano is the better all-round choice, scoring 63/100 against Seed 2.0 Code (57) and MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed (41). It leads on price and context window. Seed 2.0 Code wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Code, GPT-5.4 nano or MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed?
GPT-5.4 nano is cheaper at $0.20 input / $1.25 output per million tokens (official OpenAI API price). Seed 2.0 Code costs $0.475 input / $2.37 output per million tokens (official Volcengine Ark API price); MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed costs $0.60 input / $2.40 output per million tokens (official MiniMax (minimax.io) API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.463 per million tokens for GPT-5.4 nano versus $0.95 for Seed 2.0 Code (2.1× as much) and $1.05 for MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed (2.3× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Seed 2.0 Code has not been scored yet, GPT-5.4 nano has an ECI of 145.8 and MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Seed 2.0 Code, GPT-5.4 nano and MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
GPT-5.4 nano has the largest context window at 400,000 tokens, against 262,144 for Seed 2.0 Code and 204,800 for MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed. Maximum output per response: Seed 2.0 Code up to 131,072, GPT-5.4 nano up to 128,000, MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Seed 2.0 Code accepts text, images and video; GPT-5.4 nano accepts text and images; MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed accepts text. Seed 2.0 Code handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Seed 2.0 Code and GPT-5.4 nano is proprietary.
Which is newer?
GPT-5.4 nano is the newest, released Mar 17, 2026. Seed 2.0 Code came out Feb 14, 2026; MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed came out Feb 13, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: GPT-5.4 nano Aug 31, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
