Seed 2.0 Code vs DeepSeek OCR 2 vs MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed
Seed 2.0 Code comes out ahead, 57 to 41 and 32 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
ByteDance SeedSeed 2.0 Code
57/100- ECI—
- Price$0.475 / $2.37
- Context262K
DeepSeekDeepSeek OCR 2
32/100- ECI—
- Price$0.89 / $1.47
- Context8K
MiniMaxMiniMax-M2.5-highspeed
41/100- ECI—
- Price$0.60 / $2.40
- Context205K
Seed 2.0 Code is our pick
Seed 2.0 Code is the better all-round choice, scoring 57/100 against MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed (41) and DeepSeek OCR 2 (32). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceSeed 2.0 CodeSeed 2.0 Code $0.95 · DeepSeek OCR 2 $1.03 · MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed $1.05 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextSeed 2.0 CodeSeed 2.0 Code 262,144 · MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed 204,800 · DeepSeek OCR 2 8,192 tokens
- Widest inputsSeed 2.0 CodeSeed 2.0 Code: Text, Images, Video · DeepSeek OCR 2: Text, Images · MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed: Text
- Self-hostingDeepSeek OCR 2 and MiniMax-M2.5-highspeedPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Seed 2.0 Code | DeepSeek OCR 2 | MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 51 | 49 | 49 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 80 | 25 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 37 | 0 | 32 |
| Overall | 100% | 57/100 | 32/100 | 41/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Seed 2.0 CodeByteDance Seed | DeepSeek OCR 2DeepSeek | MiniMax-M2.5-highspeedMiniMax |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.475 (best) | $0.89 | $0.60 |
| Output | $2.37 | $1.47 (best) | $2.40 |
| Cached input | $0.095 | — | $0.06 (best) |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.95 (best) | $1.03 | $1.05 |
| Long-context rate | Over 32K: $0.712 / $3.56 | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Volcengine Ark API | Median of 1 providers | Official MiniMax (minimax.io) API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens (best) | 8,192 tokens | 204,800 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens (best) | 8,192 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | Yes | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yesminimal · low · medium · high · xhigh · max | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | No | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open | Open |
| API model ID | doubao-seed-2-0-code-preview-260215 | — | MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed |
| API providers | 10 (best) | 2 | 7 |
| Released | Feb 14, 2026 | Jan 27, 2026 | Feb 13, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Seed 2.0 Code$9.50
- DeepSeek OCR 2$11.83
- MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed$10.80
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Seed 2.0 Code, DeepSeek OCR 2 or MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed?
Seed 2.0 Code is the better all-round choice, scoring 57/100 against MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed (41) and DeepSeek OCR 2 (32). It leads on price, inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Seed 2.0 Code, DeepSeek OCR 2 or MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed?
Seed 2.0 Code is cheaper at $0.475 input / $2.37 output per million tokens (official Volcengine Ark API price). DeepSeek OCR 2 costs $0.89 input / $1.47 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider); MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed costs $0.60 input / $2.40 output per million tokens (official MiniMax (minimax.io) API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.95 per million tokens for Seed 2.0 Code versus $1.03 for DeepSeek OCR 2 (1.1× as much) and $1.05 for MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed (1.1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Seed 2.0 Code has not been scored yet, DeepSeek OCR 2 has not been scored yet and MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Seed 2.0 Code, DeepSeek OCR 2 and MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Note that DeepSeek OCR 2 does not support tool calling, which most coding agents need.
Which has the bigger context window?
Seed 2.0 Code has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 204,800 for MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed and 8,192 for DeepSeek OCR 2. Maximum output per response: Seed 2.0 Code up to 131,072, DeepSeek OCR 2 up to 8,192, MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Seed 2.0 Code accepts text, images and video; DeepSeek OCR 2 accepts text and images; MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed accepts text. Seed 2.0 Code handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
DeepSeek OCR 2 and MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Seed 2.0 Code is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Seed 2.0 Code is the newest, released Feb 14, 2026. MiniMax-M2.5-highspeed came out Feb 13, 2026; DeepSeek OCR 2 came out Jan 27, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
