Seed 1.6 Vision vs Mistral Medium 3.1
Seed 1.6 Vision comes out ahead, 63 to 50 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
ByteDance SeedSeed 1.6 Vision
63/100- ECI—
- Price$0.119 / $1.19
- Context256K
Mistral AIMistral Medium 3.1
50/100- ECI—
- Price$0.40 / $2.00
- Context262K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Seed 1.6 Vision is our pick
Seed 1.6 Vision is the better all-round choice, scoring 63/100 against Mistral Medium 3.1 (50). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceSeed 1.6 VisionSeed 1.6 Vision $0.386 · Mistral Medium 3.1 $0.80 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextMistral Medium 3.1Mistral Medium 3.1 262,144 · Seed 1.6 Vision 256,000 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsSeed 1.6 Vision: Text, Images · Mistral Medium 3.1: Text, Images
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | Seed 1.6 Vision | Mistral Medium 3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 69 | 54 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 70 | 50 |
| Context window | 20% | 36 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 63/100 | 50/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Seed 1.6 VisionByteDance Seed | Mistral Medium 3.1Mistral AI |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.119 (best) | $0.40 |
| Output | $1.19 (best) | $2.00 |
| Cached input | $0.024 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.386 (best) | $0.80 |
| Long-context rate | Over 32K: $0.178 / $2.37 | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Volcengine Ark API | Official Mistral API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 256,000 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 32,000 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | doubao-seed-1-6-vision-250815 | mistral-medium-2508 |
| API providers | 2 (best) | 1 |
| Released | Aug 15, 2025 | Aug 12, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | May 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Seed 1.6 Vision$3.56
- Mistral Medium 3.1$8.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Seed 1.6 Vision or Mistral Medium 3.1?
Seed 1.6 Vision is the better all-round choice, scoring 63/100 against Mistral Medium 3.1 (50). It leads on price and inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Seed 1.6 Vision or Mistral Medium 3.1?
Seed 1.6 Vision is cheaper at $0.119 input / $1.19 output per million tokens (official Volcengine Ark API price). Mistral Medium 3.1 costs $0.40 input / $2.00 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.386 per million tokens for Seed 1.6 Vision versus $0.80 for Mistral Medium 3.1 (2.1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Seed 1.6 Vision has not been scored yet and Mistral Medium 3.1 has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Seed 1.6 Vision and Mistral Medium 3.1 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Mistral Medium 3.1 has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 256,000 for Seed 1.6 Vision. Maximum output per response: Seed 1.6 Vision up to 32,000, Mistral Medium 3.1 up to 262,144 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Seed 1.6 Vision accepts text and images; Mistral Medium 3.1 accepts text and images. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
No. Seed 1.6 Vision and Mistral Medium 3.1 are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Seed 1.6 Vision is the newest, released Aug 15, 2025. Mistral Medium 3.1 came out Aug 12, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Mistral Medium 3.1 May 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add GLM-4.5-AirThree-way comparison
- Seed 1.6 Vision vs GLM-4.5-AirZ.ai (Zhipu)
- Seed 1.6 Vision vs Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITAI Singapore
- Seed 1.6 Vision vs Qwen3-VL PlusAlibaba (Qwen)
- Seed 1.6 Vision vs MiniMax-M2MiniMax
- Mistral Medium 3.1 vs GLM-4.5VZ.ai (Zhipu)
- Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B InstructAlibaba (Qwen)
