Seed 1.6 Flash vs Trinity Large Preview vs Sarvam 105B
Seed 1.6 Flash comes out ahead, 56 to 34 and 31 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
ByteDance SeedSeed 1.6 Flash
56/100- ECI—
- Price$0.022 / $0.223
- Context256K
Arcee AITrinity Large Preview
34/100- ECI—
- Price—
- Context524K
Sarvam AI
Sarvam 105B
31/100- ECI—
- Price$0.047 / $0.186
- Context131K
Seed 1.6 Flash is our pick
Seed 1.6 Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 56/100 against Trinity Large Preview (34) and Sarvam 105B (31). It leads on inputs & features. Trinity Large Preview wins on context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceSeed 1.6 FlashSeed 1.6 Flash $0.072 · Sarvam 105B $0.082 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend) · Trinity Large Preview unpriced
- Longest contextTrinity Large PreviewTrinity Large Preview 524,288 · Seed 1.6 Flash 256,000 · Sarvam 105B 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsSeed 1.6 FlashSeed 1.6 Flash: Text, Images · Trinity Large Preview: Text · Sarvam 105B: Text
- Self-hostingTrinity Large Preview and Sarvam 105BPublishes downloadable weights (OpenMDW-1.1)
| Measure | Weight | Seed 1.6 Flash | Trinity Large Preview | Sarvam 105B |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inputs & features | 60% | 70 | 25 | 35 |
| Context window | 40% | 36 | 49 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 56/100 | 34/100 | 31/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability and price. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Seed 1.6 FlashByteDance Seed | Trinity Large PreviewArcee AI | Sarvam 105BSarvam AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.022 (best) | — | $0.047 |
| Output | $0.223 | — | $0.186 (best) |
| Cached input | $0.0044 | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.072 (best) | — | $0.082 |
| Long-context rate | Over 32K: $0.045 / $0.445 | — | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Volcengine Ark API | — | Median of 2 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 256,000 tokens | 524,288 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens |
| Max output | 32,000 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No | Yes · low · medium · high |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Proprietary | OpenOpenMDW-1.1 | Open |
| API model ID | doubao-seed-1-6-flash-250828 | — | sarvam-105b |
| API providers | 2 | 1 | 3 (best) |
| Released | Aug 28, 2025 | Jan 27, 2026 | Sep 1, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Seed 1.6 Flash$0.668
- Trinity Large Preview—
- Sarvam 105B$0.842
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Seed 1.6 Flash, Trinity Large Preview or Sarvam 105B?
Seed 1.6 Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 56/100 against Trinity Large Preview (34) and Sarvam 105B (31). It leads on inputs & features. Trinity Large Preview wins on context window. The score weighs inputs & features 60%, context window 40%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Seed 1.6 Flash, Trinity Large Preview or Sarvam 105B?
Seed 1.6 Flash is cheaper at $0.022 input / $0.223 output per million tokens (official Volcengine Ark API price). Sarvam 105B costs $0.047 input / $0.186 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.072 per million tokens for Seed 1.6 Flash versus $0.082 for Sarvam 105B (1.1× as much). Trinity Large Preview has no published per-token price.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Seed 1.6 Flash has not been scored yet, Trinity Large Preview has not been scored yet and Sarvam 105B has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Seed 1.6 Flash, Trinity Large Preview and Sarvam 105B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Trinity Large Preview has the largest context window at 524,288 tokens, against 256,000 for Seed 1.6 Flash and 131,072 for Sarvam 105B. Maximum output per response: Seed 1.6 Flash up to 32,000, Trinity Large Preview up to 262,144, Sarvam 105B up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Seed 1.6 Flash accepts text and images; Trinity Large Preview accepts text; Sarvam 105B accepts text. Seed 1.6 Flash handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Trinity Large Preview and Sarvam 105B publishes its weights (OpenMDW-1.1) and can be self-hosted; Seed 1.6 Flash is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Trinity Large Preview is the newest, released Jan 27, 2026. Sarvam 105B came out Sep 1, 2025; Seed 1.6 Flash came out Aug 28, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
