Sarvam 30B vs Granite-4.0-H-Micro vs Voxtral Mini 3B 2507
Too close to call on our weighted score (Granite-4.0-H-Micro 65, Sarvam 30B 65, Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 61). The right pick depends on what you value most.
Sarvam AI
Sarvam 30B
65/100- ECI—
- Price$0.02 / $0.10
- Context128K
IBMGranite-4.0-H-Micro
65/100- ECI—
- Price$0.017 / $0.112
- Context131K
Mistral AIVoxtral Mini 3B 2507
61/100- ECI—
- Price$0.04 / $0.04
- Context33K
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Granite-4.0-H-Micro 65/100, Sarvam 30B 65/100, Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 61/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Sarvam 30B on price and Granite-4.0-H-Micro for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceSarvam 30B and Voxtral Mini 3B 2507Sarvam 30B $0.04 · Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 $0.04 · Granite-4.0-H-Micro $0.041 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextGranite-4.0-H-MicroGranite-4.0-H-Micro 131,072 · Sarvam 30B 128,000 · Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 32,768 tokens
- Widest inputsVoxtral Mini 3B 2507Sarvam 30B: Text · Granite-4.0-H-Micro: Text · Voxtral Mini 3B 2507: Text, Audio
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Sarvam 30B | Granite-4.0-H-Micro | Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 35 | 35 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 24 | 0 |
| Overall | 100% | 65/100 | 65/100 | 61/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Sarvam 30BSarvam AI | Granite-4.0-H-MicroIBM | Voxtral Mini 3B 2507Mistral AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.02 | $0.017 (best) | $0.04 |
| Output | $0.10 | $0.112 | $0.04 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.04 (best) | $0.041 | $0.04 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 1 providers | Median of 1 providers | Median of 2 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 128,000 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) | 32,768 tokens |
| Max output | 128,000 tokens | 131,072 tokens (best) | 32,768 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | Yes |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes · low · medium · high | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Open | OpenApache 2.0 |
| API model ID | sarvam-30b | — | — |
| API providers | 2 (best) | 1 | 2 (best) |
| Released | Feb 18, 2026 | Oct 2, 2025 | Jul 15, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Sarvam 30B$0.40
- Granite-4.0-H-Micro$0.394
- Voxtral Mini 3B 2507$0.48
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Sarvam 30B, Granite-4.0-H-Micro or Voxtral Mini 3B 2507?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Granite-4.0-H-Micro 65/100, Sarvam 30B 65/100, Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 61/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Sarvam 30B on price and Granite-4.0-H-Micro for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Sarvam 30B, Granite-4.0-H-Micro or Voxtral Mini 3B 2507?
Sarvam 30B is cheaper at $0.02 input / $0.10 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 costs $0.04 input / $0.04 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers); Granite-4.0-H-Micro costs $0.017 input / $0.112 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.04 per million tokens for Sarvam 30B versus $0.04 for Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 (1× as much) and $0.041 for Granite-4.0-H-Micro (1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Sarvam 30B has not been scored yet, Granite-4.0-H-Micro has not been scored yet and Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Sarvam 30B, Granite-4.0-H-Micro and Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Granite-4.0-H-Micro has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 128,000 for Sarvam 30B and 32,768 for Voxtral Mini 3B 2507. Maximum output per response: Sarvam 30B up to 128,000, Granite-4.0-H-Micro up to 131,072, Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 up to 32,768 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Sarvam 30B accepts text; Granite-4.0-H-Micro accepts text; Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 accepts text and audio. Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, all three publish their weights (Apache 2.0), so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Sarvam 30B is the newest, released Feb 18, 2026. Granite-4.0-H-Micro came out Oct 2, 2025; Voxtral Mini 3B 2507 came out Jul 15, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
