QwQ Plus vs Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct
Too close to call on our weighted score (Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct 41, QwQ Plus 38). The right pick depends on what you value most.
Alibaba (Qwen)
QwQ Plus
38/100- ECI—
- Price$0.80 / $2.40
- Context131K
Alibaba (Qwen)
Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct
41/100- ECI—
- Price$0.45 / $2.25
- Context262K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct 41/100, QwQ Plus 38/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct on price and Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceQwen3-Coder 30B-A3B InstructQwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct $0.90 · QwQ Plus $1.20 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextQwen3-Coder 30B-A3B InstructQwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct 262,144 · QwQ Plus 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsQwQ Plus: Text · Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct: Text
- Self-hostingQwen3-Coder 30B-A3B InstructPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | QwQ Plus | Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 46 | 52 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 35 | 25 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 38/100 | 41/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | ||
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 65.4% | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.80 | $0.45 (best) |
| Output | $2.40 | $2.25 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $1.20 | $0.90 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Over 32K: $0.75 / $3.75 |
| Price source | Official Alibaba API | Official Alibaba API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens | 262,144 tokens (best) |
| Max output | 8,192 tokens | 65,536 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | qwq-plus | qwen3-coder-30b-a3b-instruct |
| API providers | 2 | 13 (best) |
| Released | Mar 5, 2025 | Apr 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Apr 2024 | Apr 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
QwQ Plus$12.80
Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct$9.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: QwQ Plus or Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct 41/100, QwQ Plus 38/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct on price and Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, QwQ Plus or Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct?
Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct is cheaper at $0.45 input / $2.25 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). QwQ Plus costs $0.80 input / $2.40 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.90 per million tokens for Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct versus $1.20 for QwQ Plus (1.3× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. QwQ Plus has not been scored yet and Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for QwQ Plus and Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 131,072 for QwQ Plus. Maximum output per response: QwQ Plus up to 8,192, Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct up to 65,536 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
QwQ Plus accepts text; Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; QwQ Plus is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct is the newest, released Apr 2025. QwQ Plus came out Mar 5, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: QwQ Plus Apr 2024, Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B Instruct Apr 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.