ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

QwQ 32B vs QwQ Plus

Too close to call on our weighted score (QwQ 32B 54, QwQ Plus 52). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Alibaba (Qwen)

    QwQ 32B

    Released Mar 5, 2025

    54/100
    • ECI137.6
    • Price$0.66 / $1.00
    • Context131K
  2. Alibaba (Qwen)

    QwQ Plus

    Released Mar 5, 2025

    52/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.80 / $2.40
    • Context131K
  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (QwQ 32B 54/100, QwQ Plus 52/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: QwQ Plus for raw capability and QwQ 32B on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%. Capability uses the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond), because QwQ Plus has no Capabilities Index score yet.

  • CapabilityQwQ PlusShared benchmarks: QwQ Plus 65.4% · QwQ 32B 65.3%
  • Lowest priceQwQ 32BQwQ 32B $0.745 · QwQ Plus $1.20 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextAbout the sameQwQ 32B 131,072 · QwQ Plus 131,072 tokens
  • Widest inputsSame inputsQwQ 32B: Text · QwQ Plus: Text
  • Self-hostingQwQ 32BPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightQwQ 32BQwQ Plus
CapabilityShared benchmarks50%6565
Price25%5646
Inputs & features15%3535
Context window10%2424
Overall100%54/10052/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

QwQ 32B vs QwQ Plus specifications side by side
SpecificationQwQ 32BAlibaba (Qwen)QwQ PlusAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)137.6—
ECI rank#109 of 148—
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions65.3%65.4% (best)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics59.2%—
Price per million tokens
Input$0.66 (best)$0.80
Output$1.00 (best)$2.40
Cached input——
Blended (3:1)$0.745 (best)$1.20
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 1 providersOfficial Alibaba API
Limits
Context window131,072 tokens131,072 tokens
Max output8,192 tokens8,192 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesNoNo
PDFsNoNo
AudioNoNo
VideoNoNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenProprietary
API model ID—qwq-plus
API providers12 (best)
ReleasedMar 5, 2025Mar 5, 2025
Knowledge cutoffApr 2024Apr 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • QwQ 32B$8.60
  • QwQ Plus$12.80
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: QwQ 32B or QwQ Plus?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (QwQ 32B 54/100, QwQ Plus 52/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: QwQ Plus for raw capability and QwQ 32B on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%. Capability uses the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond), because QwQ Plus has no Capabilities Index score yet.

Which is cheaper, QwQ 32B or QwQ Plus?

QwQ 32B is cheaper at $0.66 input / $1.00 output per million tokens (median across 1 API provider). QwQ Plus costs $0.80 input / $2.40 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.745 per million tokens for QwQ 32B versus $1.20 for QwQ Plus (1.6× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Not every model here has a Capabilities Index score, so we compare the average of shared benchmarks (GPQA Diamond): QwQ Plus 65.4% and QwQ 32B 65.3%. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — QwQ Plus 65.4%, QwQ 32B 65.3%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for QwQ 32B and QwQ Plus yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, QwQ Plus leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

QwQ 32B and QwQ Plus share the same 131,072-token context window. Maximum output per response: QwQ 32B up to 8,192, QwQ Plus up to 8,192 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

QwQ 32B accepts text; QwQ Plus accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.

Are any of these open source?

QwQ 32B publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; QwQ Plus is proprietary.

Which is newer?

QwQ 32B is the newest, released Mar 5, 2025. QwQ Plus came out Mar 5, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: QwQ 32B Apr 2024, QwQ Plus Apr 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.