ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Qwen3-VL Plus vs Qwen3 Coder Next vs MiniMax-M2

Qwen3-VL Plus comes out ahead, 56 to 51 and 48 on our weighted score, though Qwen3 Coder Next is 18% cheaper per token.

  1. Our pick

    Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3-VL Plus

    Released Sep 23, 2025

    56/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.20 / $1.60
    • Context262K
  2. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3 Coder Next

    Released Feb 3, 2026

    51/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.20 / $1.20
    • Context262K
  3. MiniMax

    MiniMax-M2

    Released Oct 27, 2025

    48/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.30 / $1.20
    • Context205K
01 — Verdict

Qwen3-VL Plus is our pick

Qwen3-VL Plus is the better all-round choice, scoring 56/100 against Qwen3 Coder Next (51) and MiniMax-M2 (48). It leads on inputs & features. Qwen3 Coder Next wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceQwen3 Coder NextQwen3 Coder Next $0.45 · MiniMax-M2 $0.525 · Qwen3-VL Plus $0.55 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextQwen3-VL Plus and Qwen3 Coder NextQwen3-VL Plus 262,144 · Qwen3 Coder Next 262,144 · MiniMax-M2 204,800 tokens
  • Widest inputsQwen3-VL PlusQwen3-VL Plus: Text, Images · Qwen3 Coder Next: Text · MiniMax-M2: Text
  • Self-hostingQwen3 Coder Next and MiniMax-M2Publishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightQwen3-VL PlusQwen3 Coder NextMiniMax-M2
Price50%626663
Inputs & features30%603535
Context window20%373732
Overall100%56/10051/10048/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Qwen3-VL Plus vs Qwen3 Coder Next vs MiniMax-M2 specifications side by side
SpecificationQwen3-VL PlusAlibaba (Qwen)Qwen3 Coder NextAlibaba (Qwen)MiniMax-M2MiniMax
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.20 (best)$0.20 (best)$0.30
Output$1.60$1.20 (best)$1.20 (best)
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$0.55$0.45 (best)$0.525
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Alibaba APIMedian of 11 providersOfficial MiniMax (minimax.io) API
Limits
Context window262,144 tokens (best)262,144 tokens (best)204,800 tokens
Max output32,768 tokens65,536 tokens131,072 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesNoNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningYesNoYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoYesNo
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenOpen
API model IDqwen3-vl-plus—MiniMax-M2
API providers61113 (best)
ReleasedSep 23, 2025Feb 3, 2026Oct 27, 2025
Knowledge cutoffApr 2025Sep 2025—
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Qwen3-VL Plus$5.20
  • Qwen3 Coder Next$4.40
  • MiniMax-M2$5.40
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Qwen3-VL Plus, Qwen3 Coder Next or MiniMax-M2?

Qwen3-VL Plus is the better all-round choice, scoring 56/100 against Qwen3 Coder Next (51) and MiniMax-M2 (48). It leads on inputs & features. Qwen3 Coder Next wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3-VL Plus, Qwen3 Coder Next or MiniMax-M2?

Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper at $0.20 input / $1.20 output per million tokens (median across 11 API providers). MiniMax-M2 costs $0.30 input / $1.20 output per million tokens (official MiniMax (minimax.io) API price); Qwen3-VL Plus costs $0.20 input / $1.60 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.45 per million tokens for Qwen3 Coder Next versus $0.525 for MiniMax-M2 (1.2× as much) and $0.55 for Qwen3-VL Plus (1.2× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Qwen3-VL Plus has not been scored yet, Qwen3 Coder Next has not been scored yet and MiniMax-M2 has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3-VL Plus, Qwen3 Coder Next and MiniMax-M2 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3-VL Plus and Qwen3 Coder Next have the largest context windows (262,144 and 262,144 tokens), against 204,800 for MiniMax-M2. Maximum output per response: Qwen3-VL Plus up to 32,768, Qwen3 Coder Next up to 65,536, MiniMax-M2 up to 131,072 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Qwen3-VL Plus accepts text and images; Qwen3 Coder Next accepts text; MiniMax-M2 accepts text. Qwen3-VL Plus handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Qwen3 Coder Next and MiniMax-M2 publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Qwen3-VL Plus is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Qwen3 Coder Next is the newest, released Feb 3, 2026. MiniMax-M2 came out Oct 27, 2025; Qwen3-VL Plus came out Sep 23, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen3-VL Plus Apr 2025, Qwen3 Coder Next Sep 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.