Qwen3-VL Plus vs Claude Haiku 4.5
Qwen3-VL Plus comes out ahead, 56 to 48 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3-VL Plus
56/100- ECI—
- Price$0.20 / $1.60
- Context262K
AnthropicClaude Haiku 4.5
48/100- ECI142.4
- Price$1.00 / $5.00
- Context200K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Qwen3-VL Plus is our pick
Qwen3-VL Plus is the better all-round choice, scoring 56/100 against Claude Haiku 4.5 (48). It leads on price and context window. Claude Haiku 4.5 wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceQwen3-VL PlusQwen3-VL Plus $0.55 · Claude Haiku 4.5 $2.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextQwen3-VL PlusQwen3-VL Plus 262,144 · Claude Haiku 4.5 200,000 tokens
- Widest inputsClaude Haiku 4.5Qwen3-VL Plus: Text, Images · Claude Haiku 4.5: Text, Images, PDFs
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | Qwen3-VL Plus | Claude Haiku 4.5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 62 | 36 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 60 | 80 |
| Context window | 20% | 37 | 32 |
| Overall | 100% | 56/100 | 48/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Qwen3-VL PlusAlibaba (Qwen) | Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | 142.4 |
| ECI rank | — | #90 of 148 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | — | 71.2% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | — | 66.7% |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | — | 13.2% |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.20 (best) | $1.00 |
| Output | $1.60 (best) | $5.00 |
| Cached input | — | $0.10 |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.55 (best) | $2.00 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Alibaba API | Official Anthropic API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens (best) | 200,000 tokens |
| Max output | 32,768 tokens | 64,000 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | Yes |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | qwen3-vl-plus | claude-haiku-4-5 |
| API providers | 6 | 34 (best) |
| Released | Sep 23, 2025 | Oct 15, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Apr 2025 | Feb 28, 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Qwen3-VL Plus$5.20
- Claude Haiku 4.5$20.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Qwen3-VL Plus or Claude Haiku 4.5?
Qwen3-VL Plus is the better all-round choice, scoring 56/100 against Claude Haiku 4.5 (48). It leads on price and context window. Claude Haiku 4.5 wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3-VL Plus or Claude Haiku 4.5?
Qwen3-VL Plus is cheaper at $0.20 input / $1.60 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). Claude Haiku 4.5 costs $1.00 input / $5.00 output per million tokens (official Anthropic API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.55 per million tokens for Qwen3-VL Plus versus $2.00 for Claude Haiku 4.5 (3.6× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Qwen3-VL Plus has not been scored yet and Claude Haiku 4.5 has an ECI of 142.4.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3-VL Plus and Claude Haiku 4.5 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3-VL Plus has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 200,000 for Claude Haiku 4.5. Maximum output per response: Qwen3-VL Plus up to 32,768, Claude Haiku 4.5 up to 64,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Qwen3-VL Plus accepts text and images; Claude Haiku 4.5 accepts text, images and PDFs. Claude Haiku 4.5 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
No. Qwen3-VL Plus and Claude Haiku 4.5 are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Claude Haiku 4.5 is the newest, released Oct 15, 2025. Qwen3-VL Plus came out Sep 23, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen3-VL Plus Apr 2025, Claude Haiku 4.5 Feb 28, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add MiniMax-M2Three-way comparison
- Qwen3-VL Plus vs MiniMax-M2MiniMax
- Qwen3-VL Plus vs Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITAI Singapore
- Qwen3-VL Plus vs GPT-5.1 Codex miniOpenAI
- Qwen3-VL Plus vs Seed 1.6ByteDance Seed
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen3 MaxAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 142.4
- Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GLM-4.7Z.ai (Zhipu) · ECI 143.5
