ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct vs Solar Pro 2

Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B comes out ahead, 59 to 52 and 45 on our weighted score, though Solar Pro 2 is 29% cheaper per token.

  1. Our pick

    Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B

    Released Apr 2025

    59/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.20 / $0.80
    • Context131K
    Full specs Remove Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B

  2. NVIDIA

    Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

    Released Apr 15, 2025

    45/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.478 / $0.504
    • Context128K
    Full specs Remove Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

  3. Upstage

    Solar Pro 2

    Released May 20, 2025

    52/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.25 / $0.25
    • Context66K
    Full specs Remove Solar Pro 2
01 — Verdict

Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B is our pick

Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B is the better all-round choice, scoring 59/100 against Solar Pro 2 (52) and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct (45). It leads on inputs & features. Solar Pro 2 wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceSolar Pro 2Solar Pro 2 $0.25 · Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B $0.35 · Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct $0.485 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextQwen3-VL 30B-A3BQwen3-VL 30B-A3B 131,072 · Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct 128,000 · Solar Pro 2 65,536 tokens
  • Widest inputsQwen3-VL 30B-A3BQwen3-VL 30B-A3B: Text, Images · Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct: Text · Solar Pro 2: Text
  • Self-hostingQwen3-VL 30B-A3B and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightQwen3-VL 30B-A3BLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructSolar Pro 2
Price50%726578
Inputs & features30%602535
Context window20%242412
Overall100%59/10045/10052/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct vs Solar Pro 2 specifications side by side
SpecificationQwen3-VL 30B-A3BAlibaba (Qwen)Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructNVIDIASolar Pro 2Upstage
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.20 (best)$0.478$0.25
Output$0.80$0.504$0.25 (best)
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$0.35$0.485$0.25 (best)
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Alibaba APIMedian of 2 providersOfficial Upstage API
Limits
Context window131,072 tokens (best)128,000 tokens65,536 tokens
Max output32,768 tokens (best)8,192 tokens8,192 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesNoNo
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoNo
ReasoningYesNoYesminimal · high
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenOpenProprietary
API model IDqwen3-vl-30b-a3bnvidia/llama-3.1-nemotron-70b-instructsolar-pro2
API providers13 (best)2
ReleasedApr 2025Apr 15, 2025May 20, 2025
Knowledge cutoffApr 2025—Mar 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B$3.60
  • Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct$5.79
  • Solar Pro 2$3.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct or Solar Pro 2?

Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B is the better all-round choice, scoring 59/100 against Solar Pro 2 (52) and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct (45). It leads on inputs & features. Solar Pro 2 wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct or Solar Pro 2?

Solar Pro 2 is cheaper at $0.25 input / $0.25 output per million tokens (official Upstage API price). Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B costs $0.20 input / $0.80 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price); Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct costs $0.478 input / $0.504 output per million tokens (median across 2 API providers; free on Nvidia). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.25 per million tokens for Solar Pro 2 versus $0.35 for Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B (1.4× as much) and $0.485 for Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct (1.9× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B has not been scored yet, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has not been scored yet and Solar Pro 2 has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct and Solar Pro 2 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B has the largest context window at 131,072 tokens, against 128,000 for Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct and 65,536 for Solar Pro 2. Maximum output per response: Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B up to 32,768, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct up to 8,192, Solar Pro 2 up to 8,192 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B accepts text and images; Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct accepts text; Solar Pro 2 accepts text. Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Solar Pro 2 is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Solar Pro 2 is the newest, released May 20, 2025. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct came out Apr 15, 2025; Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B came out Apr 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen3-VL 30B-A3B Apr 2025, Solar Pro 2 Mar 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.

05 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons