ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) vs QVQ Max

QVQ Max comes out ahead, 40 to 34 on our weighted score, though Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) is 11% cheaper per token.

  1. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)

    Released Sep 2025

    34/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.50 / $6.00
    • Context131K
    Full specs Remove Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)
  2. Our pick

    Alibaba (Qwen)

    QVQ Max

    Released Mar 25, 2025

    40/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.20 / $4.80
    • Context131K
    Full specs Remove QVQ Max

  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

QVQ Max is our pick

QVQ Max is the better all-round choice, scoring 40/100 against Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) (34). It leads on inputs & features. Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceQwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) $1.88 · QVQ Max $2.10 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextAbout the sameQwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) 131,072 · QVQ Max 131,072 tokens
  • Widest inputsQVQ MaxQwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking): Text · QVQ Max: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingQwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)Publishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightQwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)QVQ Max
Price50%3735
Inputs & features30%3560
Context window20%2424
Overall100%34/10040/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) vs QVQ Max specifications side by side
SpecificationQwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)Alibaba (Qwen)QVQ MaxAlibaba (Qwen)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)——
ECI rank——
Price per million tokens
Input$0.50 (best)$1.20
Output$6.00$4.80 (best)
Cached input——
Blended (3:1)$1.88 (best)$2.10
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Alibaba APIOfficial Alibaba API
Limits
Context window131,072 tokens131,072 tokens
Max output32,768 tokens (best)8,192 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesNoYes
PDFsNoNo
AudioNoNo
VideoNoNo
ReasoningYesYes
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenProprietary
API model IDqwen3-next-80b-a3b-thinkingqvq-max
API providers10 (best)1
ReleasedSep 2025Mar 25, 2025
Knowledge cutoffApr 2025Apr 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking)$17.00
  • QVQ Max$21.60
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) or QVQ Max?

QVQ Max is the better all-round choice, scoring 40/100 against Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) (34). It leads on inputs & features. Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) wins on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) or QVQ Max?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) is cheaper at $0.50 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). QVQ Max costs $1.20 input / $4.80 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.88 per million tokens for Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) versus $2.10 for QVQ Max (1.1× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) has not been scored yet and QVQ Max has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) and QVQ Max yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) and QVQ Max share the same 131,072-token context window. Maximum output per response: Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) up to 32,768, QVQ Max up to 8,192 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) accepts text; QVQ Max accepts text and images. QVQ Max handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; QVQ Max is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) is the newest, released Sep 2025. QVQ Max came out Mar 25, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B (Thinking) Apr 2025, QVQ Max Apr 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.

05 — Keep comparing

Related comparisons