Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs GLM-4.5V
Too close to call on our weighted score (GLM-4.5V 49, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking 48, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct 39). The right pick depends on what you value most.
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
39/100- ECI—
- Price$0.50 / $2.00
- Context131K
- Alibaba (Qwen)
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
48/100- ECI—
- Price$0.40 / $4.00
- Context131K
Z.ai (Zhipu)GLM-4.5V
49/100- ECI—
- Price$0.60 / $1.80
- Context64K
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (GLM-4.5V 49/100, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking 48/100, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct 39/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceQwen3-Next 80B-A3B InstructQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct $0.875 · GLM-4.5V $0.90 · Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking $1.30 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B ThinkingQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct 131,072 · Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking 131,072 · GLM-4.5V 64,000 tokens
- Widest inputsGLM-4.5VQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: Text · Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking: Text, Images · GLM-4.5V: Text, Images, Video
- Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
| Measure | Weight | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct | Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking | GLM-4.5V |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 53 | 44 | 52 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 25 | 70 | 70 |
| Context window | 20% | 24 | 24 | 12 |
| Overall | 100% | 39/100 | 48/100 | 49/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B InstructAlibaba (Qwen) | Qwen3 VL 235B A22B ThinkingAlibaba (Qwen) | GLM-4.5VZ.ai (Zhipu) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $0.50 | $0.40 (best) | $0.60 |
| Output | $2.00 | $4.00 | $1.80 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.875 (best) | $1.30 | $0.90 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Alibaba API | Median of 9 providers | Official Z.AI API |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 131,072 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens (best) | 64,000 tokens |
| Max output | 32,768 tokens (best) | 32,768 tokens (best) | 16,384 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | Yes |
| Reasoning | No | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Open | Open |
| API model ID | qwen3-next-80b-a3b-instruct | — | glm-4.5v |
| API providers | 13 (best) | 9 | 11 |
| Released | Sep 2025 | Sep 23, 2025 | Aug 11, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Apr 2025 | Mar 31, 2025 | Apr 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct$9.00
- Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking$12.00
- GLM-4.5V$9.60
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking or GLM-4.5V?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (GLM-4.5V 49/100, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking 48/100, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct 39/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking or GLM-4.5V?
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is cheaper at $0.50 input / $2.00 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). GLM-4.5V costs $0.60 input / $1.80 output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price); Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking costs $0.40 input / $4.00 output per million tokens (median across 9 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.875 per million tokens for Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct versus $0.90 for GLM-4.5V (1× as much) and $1.30 for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking (1.5× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has not been scored yet, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking has not been scored yet and GLM-4.5V has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking and GLM-4.5V yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking have the largest context windows (131,072 and 131,072 tokens), against 64,000 for GLM-4.5V. Maximum output per response: Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct up to 32,768, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking up to 32,768, GLM-4.5V up to 16,384 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct accepts text; Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking accepts text and images; GLM-4.5V accepts text, images and video. GLM-4.5V handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Yes, all three publish their weights, so you can self-host them.
Which is newer?
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking is the newest, released Sep 23, 2025. Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct came out Sep 2025; GLM-4.5V came out Aug 11, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct Apr 2025, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking Mar 31, 2025, GLM-4.5V Apr 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct vs Mistral Medium 3.1Mistral AI
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct vs Ling-1TinclusionAI
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct vs Apertus 70BSwiss AI
- Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs Apertus 70BSwiss AI
- Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs GLM-4.6Z.ai (Zhipu)
- Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking vs Ling-1TinclusionAI
