ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct vs Qwen3 Max vs GLM-4.5V

GLM-4.5V comes out ahead, 49 to 39 and 31 on our weighted score.

  1. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct

    Released Sep 2025

    39/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.50 / $2.00
    • Context131K
  2. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3 Max

    Released Sep 23, 2025

    31/100
    • ECI142.4
    • Price$1.20 / $6.00
    • Context262K
  3. Our pick

    Z.ai (Zhipu)

    GLM-4.5V

    Released Aug 11, 2025

    49/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.60 / $1.80
    • Context64K
01 — Verdict

GLM-4.5V is our pick

GLM-4.5V is the better all-round choice, scoring 49/100 against Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct (39) and Qwen3 Max (31). It leads on inputs & features. Qwen3 Max wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceQwen3-Next 80B-A3B InstructQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct $0.875 · GLM-4.5V $0.90 · Qwen3 Max $2.40 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextQwen3 MaxQwen3 Max 262,144 · Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct 131,072 · GLM-4.5V 64,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGLM-4.5VQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: Text · Qwen3 Max: Text · GLM-4.5V: Text, Images, Video
  • Self-hostingQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct and GLM-4.5VPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightQwen3-Next 80B-A3B InstructQwen3 MaxGLM-4.5V
Price50%533252
Inputs & features30%252570
Context window20%243712
Overall100%39/10031/10049/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct vs Qwen3 Max vs GLM-4.5V specifications side by side
SpecificationQwen3-Next 80B-A3B InstructAlibaba (Qwen)Qwen3 MaxAlibaba (Qwen)GLM-4.5VZ.ai (Zhipu)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)—142.4—
ECI rank—#91 of 148—
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions—72.6%—
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics—19.0%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics—73.3%—
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions—48.8%—
Price per million tokens
Input$0.50 (best)$1.20$0.60
Output$2.00$6.00$1.80 (best)
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$0.875 (best)$2.40$0.90
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Alibaba APIOfficial Alibaba APIOfficial Z.AI API
Limits
Context window131,072 tokens262,144 tokens (best)64,000 tokens
Max output32,768 tokens65,536 tokens (best)16,384 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoNoYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoYes
ReasoningNoNoYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenProprietaryOpen
API model IDqwen3-next-80b-a3b-instructqwen3-maxglm-4.5v
API providers1316 (best)11
ReleasedSep 2025Sep 23, 2025Aug 11, 2025
Knowledge cutoffApr 2025Apr 2025Apr 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct$9.00
  • Qwen3 Max$24.00
  • GLM-4.5V$9.60
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct, Qwen3 Max or GLM-4.5V?

GLM-4.5V is the better all-round choice, scoring 49/100 against Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct (39) and Qwen3 Max (31). It leads on inputs & features. Qwen3 Max wins on context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct, Qwen3 Max or GLM-4.5V?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is cheaper at $0.50 input / $2.00 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). GLM-4.5V costs $0.60 input / $1.80 output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price); Qwen3 Max costs $1.20 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.875 per million tokens for Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct versus $0.90 for GLM-4.5V (1× as much) and $2.40 for Qwen3 Max (2.7× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has not been scored yet, Qwen3 Max has an ECI of 142.4 and GLM-4.5V has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct, Qwen3 Max and GLM-4.5V yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 Max has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 131,072 for Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct and 64,000 for GLM-4.5V. Maximum output per response: Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct up to 32,768, Qwen3 Max up to 65,536, GLM-4.5V up to 16,384 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct accepts text; Qwen3 Max accepts text; GLM-4.5V accepts text, images and video. GLM-4.5V handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct and GLM-4.5V publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Qwen3 Max is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Qwen3 Max is the newest, released Sep 23, 2025. Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct came out Sep 2025; GLM-4.5V came out Aug 11, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct Apr 2025, Qwen3 Max Apr 2025, GLM-4.5V Apr 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.