ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct vs QVQ Max vs GLM-4.5V

GLM-4.5V comes out ahead, 49 to 40 and 39 on our weighted score.

  1. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct

    Released Sep 2025

    39/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.50 / $2.00
    • Context131K
  2. Alibaba (Qwen)

    QVQ Max

    Released Mar 25, 2025

    40/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$1.20 / $4.80
    • Context131K
  3. Our pick

    Z.ai (Zhipu)

    GLM-4.5V

    Released Aug 11, 2025

    49/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.60 / $1.80
    • Context64K
01 — Verdict

GLM-4.5V is our pick

GLM-4.5V is the better all-round choice, scoring 49/100 against QVQ Max (40) and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct (39). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceQwen3-Next 80B-A3B InstructQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct $0.875 · GLM-4.5V $0.90 · QVQ Max $2.10 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct and QVQ MaxQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct 131,072 · QVQ Max 131,072 · GLM-4.5V 64,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsGLM-4.5VQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: Text · QVQ Max: Text, Images · GLM-4.5V: Text, Images, Video
  • Self-hostingQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct and GLM-4.5VPublishes downloadable weights
How the score is built
MeasureWeightQwen3-Next 80B-A3B InstructQVQ MaxGLM-4.5V
Price50%533552
Inputs & features30%256070
Context window20%242412
Overall100%39/10040/10049/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct vs QVQ Max vs GLM-4.5V specifications side by side
SpecificationQwen3-Next 80B-A3B InstructAlibaba (Qwen)QVQ MaxAlibaba (Qwen)GLM-4.5VZ.ai (Zhipu)
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)———
ECI rank———
Price per million tokens
Input$0.50 (best)$1.20$0.60
Output$2.00$4.80$1.80 (best)
Cached input———
Blended (3:1)$0.875 (best)$2.10$0.90
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceOfficial Alibaba APIOfficial Alibaba APIOfficial Z.AI API
Limits
Context window131,072 tokens (best)131,072 tokens (best)64,000 tokens
Max output32,768 tokens (best)8,192 tokens16,384 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesNoYesYes
PDFsNoNoNo
AudioNoNoNo
VideoNoNoYes
ReasoningNoYesYes
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputNoNoNo
Availability
WeightsOpenProprietaryOpen
API model IDqwen3-next-80b-a3b-instructqvq-maxglm-4.5v
API providers13 (best)111
ReleasedSep 2025Mar 25, 2025Aug 11, 2025
Knowledge cutoffApr 2025Apr 2024Apr 2025
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct$9.00
  • QVQ Max$21.60
  • GLM-4.5V$9.60
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct, QVQ Max or GLM-4.5V?

GLM-4.5V is the better all-round choice, scoring 49/100 against QVQ Max (40) and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct (39). It leads on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct, QVQ Max or GLM-4.5V?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is cheaper at $0.50 input / $2.00 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). GLM-4.5V costs $0.60 input / $1.80 output per million tokens (official Z.AI API price); QVQ Max costs $1.20 input / $4.80 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.875 per million tokens for Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct versus $0.90 for GLM-4.5V (1× as much) and $2.10 for QVQ Max (2.4× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has not been scored yet, QVQ Max has not been scored yet and GLM-4.5V has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct, QVQ Max and GLM-4.5V yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct and QVQ Max have the largest context windows (131,072 and 131,072 tokens), against 64,000 for GLM-4.5V. Maximum output per response: Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct up to 32,768, QVQ Max up to 8,192, GLM-4.5V up to 16,384 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct accepts text; QVQ Max accepts text and images; GLM-4.5V accepts text, images and video. GLM-4.5V handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct and GLM-4.5V publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; QVQ Max is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the newest, released Sep 2025. GLM-4.5V came out Aug 11, 2025; QVQ Max came out Mar 25, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct Apr 2025, QVQ Max Apr 2024, GLM-4.5V Apr 2025.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.