Qwen3 Max vs Qwen3 235B-A22B
Too close to call on our weighted score (Qwen3 235B-A22B 51, Qwen3 Max 50). The right pick depends on what you value most.
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3 Max
50/100- ECI142.4
- Price$1.20 / $6.00
- Context262K
- Alibaba (Qwen)
Qwen3 235B-A22B
51/100- ECI139.4
- Price$0.70 / $2.80
- Context131K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Qwen3 235B-A22B 51/100, Qwen3 Max 50/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3 Max for raw capability and Qwen3 235B-A22B on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityQwen3 MaxCapabilities Index (ECI): Qwen3 Max 142.4 · Qwen3 235B-A22B 139.4
- Lowest priceQwen3 235B-A22BQwen3 235B-A22B $1.23 · Qwen3 Max $2.40 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextQwen3 MaxQwen3 Max 262,144 · Qwen3 235B-A22B 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsQwen3 Max: Text · Qwen3 235B-A22B: Text
- Self-hostingQwen3 235B-A22BPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Qwen3 Max | Qwen3 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 68 | 65 |
| Price | 25% | 32 | 46 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 25 | 35 |
| Context window | 10% | 37 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 50/100 | 51/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Qwen3 MaxAlibaba (Qwen) | Qwen3 235B-A22BAlibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 142.4 (best) | 139.4 |
| ECI rank | #91 of 148 (best) | #103 of 148 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 72.6% (best) | 70.7% |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | 19.0% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 73.3% | — |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 48.8% | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $1.20 | $0.70 (best) |
| Output | $6.00 | $2.80 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $2.40 | $1.23 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Alibaba API | Official Alibaba API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens |
| Max output | 65,536 tokens (best) | 16,384 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | qwen3-max | qwen3-235b-a22b |
| API providers | 16 (best) | 7 |
| Released | Sep 23, 2025 | Apr 28, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Apr 2025 | Apr 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Qwen3 Max$24.00
- Qwen3 235B-A22B$12.60
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Qwen3 Max or Qwen3 235B-A22B?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Qwen3 235B-A22B 51/100, Qwen3 Max 50/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3 Max for raw capability and Qwen3 235B-A22B on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3 Max or Qwen3 235B-A22B?
Qwen3 235B-A22B is cheaper at $0.70 input / $2.80 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). Qwen3 Max costs $1.20 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $1.23 per million tokens for Qwen3 235B-A22B versus $2.40 for Qwen3 Max (2× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Qwen3 Max scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Qwen3 Max 142.4 (#91 of 148) and Qwen3 235B-A22B 139.4 (#103 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (140.0–144.6 vs 135.2–140.8), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Qwen3 Max 72.6%, Qwen3 235B-A22B 70.7%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3 Max and Qwen3 235B-A22B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Qwen3 Max leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3 Max has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 131,072 for Qwen3 235B-A22B. Maximum output per response: Qwen3 Max up to 65,536, Qwen3 235B-A22B up to 16,384 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Qwen3 Max accepts text; Qwen3 235B-A22B accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Qwen3 235B-A22B publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Qwen3 Max is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Qwen3 Max is the newest, released Sep 23, 2025. Qwen3 235B-A22B came out Apr 28, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen3 Max Apr 2025, Qwen3 235B-A22B Apr 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Claude Haiku 4.5Three-way comparison
- Qwen3 Max vs Claude Haiku 4.5Anthropic · ECI 142.4
- Qwen3 Max vs Mistral Medium 3.5Mistral AI · ECI 141.4
- Qwen3 Max vs Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle · ECI 145.3
- Qwen3 Max vs GLM-4.7Z.ai (Zhipu) · ECI 143.5
- Qwen3 235B-A22B vs DeepSeek-R1DeepSeek · ECI 139.0
- Qwen3 235B-A22B vs Gemini 2.5 FlashGoogle · ECI 140.8
