ZMIME
Comparison · 2 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Qwen3 Coder Next vs Mistral Large 3

Too close to call on our weighted score (Qwen3 Coder Next 51, Mistral Large 3 50). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3 Coder Next

    Released Feb 3, 2026

    51/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.20 / $1.20
    • Context262K
  2. Mistral AI

    Mistral Large 3

    Released Dec 2, 2025

    50/100
    • ECI—
    • Price$0.50 / $1.50
    • Context262K
  3. Add a model

    Make it a three-way comparison.

01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Qwen3 Coder Next 51/100, Mistral Large 3 50/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3 Coder Next on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

  • CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
  • Lowest priceQwen3 Coder NextQwen3 Coder Next $0.45 · Mistral Large 3 $0.75 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextAbout the sameQwen3 Coder Next 262,144 · Mistral Large 3 262,144 tokens
  • Widest inputsMistral Large 3Qwen3 Coder Next: Text · Mistral Large 3: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingAll open weightsEvery model here can be downloaded and run on your own hardware
How the score is built
MeasureWeightQwen3 Coder NextMistral Large 3
Price50%6656
Inputs & features30%3550
Context window20%3737
Overall100%51/10050/100

Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.

02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Qwen3 Coder Next vs Mistral Large 3 specifications side by side
SpecificationQwen3 Coder NextAlibaba (Qwen)Mistral Large 3Mistral AI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)——
ECI rank——
Price per million tokens
Input$0.20 (best)$0.50
Output$1.20 (best)$1.50
Cached input—$0.05
Blended (3:1)$0.45 (best)$0.75
Long-context rateSame rateSame rate
Price sourceMedian of 11 providersOfficial Mistral API
Limits
Context window262,144 tokens262,144 tokens
Max output65,536 tokens262,144 tokens (best)
Inputs and features
TextYesYes
ImagesNoYes
PDFsNoNo
AudioNoNo
VideoNoNo
ReasoningNoNo
Tool callingYesYes
Structured outputYesNo
Availability
WeightsOpenOpen
API model ID—mistral-large-2512
API providers1113 (best)
ReleasedFeb 3, 2026Dec 2, 2025
Knowledge cutoffSep 2025Nov 2024
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Qwen3 Coder Next$4.40
  • Mistral Large 3$8.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Qwen3 Coder Next or Mistral Large 3?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Qwen3 Coder Next 51/100, Mistral Large 3 50/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3 Coder Next on price. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 Coder Next or Mistral Large 3?

Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper at $0.20 input / $1.20 output per million tokens (median across 11 API providers). Mistral Large 3 costs $0.50 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (official Mistral API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.45 per million tokens for Qwen3 Coder Next versus $0.75 for Mistral Large 3 (1.7× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Qwen3 Coder Next has not been scored yet and Mistral Large 3 has not been scored yet.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3 Coder Next and Mistral Large 3 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3 Coder Next and Mistral Large 3 share the same 262,144-token context window. Maximum output per response: Qwen3 Coder Next up to 65,536, Mistral Large 3 up to 262,144 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Qwen3 Coder Next accepts text; Mistral Large 3 accepts text and images. Mistral Large 3 handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Yes, both publish their weights, so you can self-host them.

Which is newer?

Qwen3 Coder Next is the newest, released Feb 3, 2026. Mistral Large 3 came out Dec 2, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen3 Coder Next Sep 2025, Mistral Large 3 Nov 2024.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.