Qwen3 Coder Flash vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
Qwen3 Coder Flash comes out ahead, 50 to 39 on our weighted score, and it is the cheaper option too.
- Our pick
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3 Coder Flash
50/100- ECI—
- Price$0.30 / $1.50
- Context1M
- Alibaba (Qwen)
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
39/100- ECI—
- Price$0.50 / $2.00
- Context131K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Qwen3 Coder Flash is our pick
Qwen3 Coder Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 50/100 against Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct (39). It leads on price and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceQwen3 Coder FlashQwen3 Coder Flash $0.60 · Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct $0.875 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextQwen3 Coder FlashQwen3 Coder Flash 1,000,000 · Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct 131,072 tokens
- Widest inputsSame inputsQwen3 Coder Flash: Text · Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: Text
- Self-hostingQwen3-Next 80B-A3B InstructPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Qwen3 Coder Flash | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 60 | 53 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 25 | 25 |
| Context window | 20% | 60 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 50/100 | 39/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Qwen3 Coder FlashAlibaba (Qwen) | Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B InstructAlibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $0.30 (best) | $0.50 |
| Output | $1.50 (best) | $2.00 |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $0.60 (best) | $0.875 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Alibaba API | Official Alibaba API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens (best) | 131,072 tokens |
| Max output | 65,536 tokens (best) | 32,768 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | qwen3-coder-flash | qwen3-next-80b-a3b-instruct |
| API providers | 10 | 13 (best) |
| Released | Jul 28, 2025 | Sep 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Apr 2025 | Apr 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Qwen3 Coder Flash$6.00
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct$9.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Qwen3 Coder Flash or Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct?
Qwen3 Coder Flash is the better all-round choice, scoring 50/100 against Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct (39). It leads on price and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3 Coder Flash or Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct?
Qwen3 Coder Flash is cheaper at $0.30 input / $1.50 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct costs $0.50 input / $2.00 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.60 per million tokens for Qwen3 Coder Flash versus $0.875 for Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct (1.5× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Qwen3 Coder Flash has not been scored yet and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3 Coder Flash and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3 Coder Flash has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 131,072 for Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct. Maximum output per response: Qwen3 Coder Flash up to 65,536, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct up to 32,768 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Qwen3 Coder Flash accepts text; Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct accepts text. They handle the same number of input types.
Are any of these open source?
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Qwen3 Coder Flash is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the newest, released Sep 2025. Qwen3 Coder Flash came out Jul 28, 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen3 Coder Flash Apr 2025, Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct Apr 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Mistral Medium 3.1Three-way comparison
- Qwen3 Coder Flash vs Mistral Medium 3.1Mistral AI
- Qwen3 Coder Flash vs GLM-4.5-AirZ.ai (Zhipu)
- Qwen3 Coder Flash vs MiniMax-M2MiniMax
- Qwen3 Coder Flash vs GPT-5.1 Codex miniOpenAI
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct vs GLM-4.5VZ.ai (Zhipu)
- Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct vs Mistral Medium 3.1Mistral AI
