Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct vs Claude Opus 4.1 vs Pixtral Large (25.02)
Pixtral Large (25.02) comes out ahead, 33 to 28 and 27 on our weighted score.
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
28/100- ECI—
- Price$1.50 / $7.50
- Context262K
AnthropicClaude Opus 4.1
27/100- ECI144.1
- Price$15.00 / $75.00
- Context200K
- Our pick
Mistral AIPixtral Large (25.02)
33/100- ECI—
- Price$2.00 / $6.00
- Context128K
Pixtral Large (25.02) is our pick
Pixtral Large (25.02) is the better all-round choice, scoring 33/100 against Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct (28) and Claude Opus 4.1 (27). Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct wins on context window. Claude Opus 4.1 wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct and Pixtral Large (25.02)Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct $3.00 · Pixtral Large (25.02) $3.00 · Claude Opus 4.1 $30.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct 262,144 · Claude Opus 4.1 200,000 · Pixtral Large (25.02) 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsClaude Opus 4.1Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: Text · Claude Opus 4.1: Text, Images, PDFs · Pixtral Large (25.02): Text, Images
- Self-hostingQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct | Claude Opus 4.1 | Pixtral Large (25.02) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 27 | 0 | 27 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 25 | 70 | 50 |
| Context window | 20% | 37 | 32 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 28/100 | 27/100 | 33/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructAlibaba (Qwen) | Claude Opus 4.1Anthropic | Pixtral Large (25.02)Mistral AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | 144.1 | — |
| ECI rank | — | #81 of 148 | — |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | — | 77.3% | — |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | — | 12.6% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | — | 68.9% | — |
| SWE-bench VerifiedFixing real GitHub issues | — | 73.4% | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $1.50 (best) | $15.00 | $2.00 |
| Output | $7.50 | $75.00 | $6.00 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.00 (best) | $30.00 | $3.00 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Over 32K: $2.70 / $13.50 | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Alibaba API | Median of 14 providers | Median of 3 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens (best) | 200,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Max output | 65,536 tokens (best) | 32,000 tokens | 8,192 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | Yes | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | qwen3-coder-480b-a35b-instruct | — | — |
| API providers | 7 | 14 (best) | 3 |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Aug 5, 2025 | Apr 8, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Apr 2025 | Mar 31, 2025 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct$30.00
- Claude Opus 4.1$300.00
- Pixtral Large (25.02)$32.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct, Claude Opus 4.1 or Pixtral Large (25.02)?
Pixtral Large (25.02) is the better all-round choice, scoring 33/100 against Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct (28) and Claude Opus 4.1 (27). Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct wins on context window. Claude Opus 4.1 wins on inputs & features. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct, Claude Opus 4.1 or Pixtral Large (25.02)?
Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is cheaper at $1.50 input / $7.50 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). Pixtral Large (25.02) costs $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers); Claude Opus 4.1 costs $15.00 input / $75.00 output per million tokens (median across 14 API providers). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $3.00 per million tokens for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct versus $3.00 for Pixtral Large (25.02) (1× as much) and $30.00 for Claude Opus 4.1 (10× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has not been scored yet, Claude Opus 4.1 has an ECI of 144.1 and Pixtral Large (25.02) has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct and Pixtral Large (25.02) yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 200,000 for Claude Opus 4.1 and 128,000 for Pixtral Large (25.02). Maximum output per response: Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct up to 65,536, Claude Opus 4.1 up to 32,000, Pixtral Large (25.02) up to 8,192 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct accepts text; Claude Opus 4.1 accepts text, images and PDFs; Pixtral Large (25.02) accepts text and images. Claude Opus 4.1 handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Claude Opus 4.1 and Pixtral Large (25.02) is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Claude Opus 4.1 is the newest, released Aug 5, 2025. Pixtral Large (25.02) came out Apr 8, 2025; Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct came out Apr 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct Apr 2025, Claude Opus 4.1 Mar 31, 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct vs Sonar Deep ResearchPerplexity
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct vs Command ACohere
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct vs Jamba LargeAI21 Labs
- Claude Opus 4.1 vs o3-proOpenAI · ECI 147.4
- Claude Opus 4.1 vs Gemini 2.5 ProGoogle · ECI 145.3
- Claude Opus 4.1 vs Qwen3 MaxAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 142.4
