Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct vs Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview vs Pixtral Large (25.02)
Too close to call on our weighted score (Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview 35, Pixtral Large (25.02) 33, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct 28). The right pick depends on what you value most.
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
28/100- ECI—
- Price$1.50 / $7.50
- Context262K
GoogleGemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview
35/100- ECI—
- Price$1.25 / $10.00
- Context128K
Mistral AIPixtral Large (25.02)
33/100- ECI—
- Price$2.00 / $6.00
- Context128K
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview 35/100, Pixtral Large (25.02) 33/100, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct 28/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct on price and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct and Pixtral Large (25.02)Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct $3.00 · Pixtral Large (25.02) $3.00 · Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview $3.44 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct 262,144 · Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview 128,000 · Pixtral Large (25.02) 128,000 tokens
- Widest inputsGemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview and Pixtral Large (25.02)Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: Text · Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview: Text, Images · Pixtral Large (25.02): Text, Images
- Self-hostingQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct | Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview | Pixtral Large (25.02) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 27 | 24 | 27 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 25 | 60 | 50 |
| Context window | 20% | 37 | 24 | 24 |
| Overall | 100% | 28/100 | 35/100 | 33/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B InstructAlibaba (Qwen) | Gemini 2.5 Computer Use PreviewGoogle | Pixtral Large (25.02)Mistral AI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capability | |||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | |||
| Input | $1.50 | $1.25 (best) | $2.00 |
| Output | $7.50 | $10.00 | $6.00 (best) |
| Cached input | — | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.00 (best) | $3.44 | $3.00 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Over 32K: $2.70 / $13.50 | Over 200K: $2.50 / $15.00 | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Alibaba API | Official Google API | Median of 3 providers |
| Limits | |||
| Context window | 262,144 tokens (best) | 128,000 tokens | 128,000 tokens |
| Max output | 65,536 tokens (best) | 64,000 tokens | 8,192 tokens |
| Inputs and features | |||
| Text | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Images | No | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | No | No | No |
| Audio | No | No | No |
| Video | No | No | No |
| Reasoning | No | Yes | No |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | No | No |
| Availability | |||
| Weights | Open | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | qwen3-coder-480b-a35b-instruct | gemini-2.5-computer-use-preview-10-2025 | — |
| API providers | 7 (best) | 2 | 3 |
| Released | Apr 2025 | Oct 7, 2025 | Apr 8, 2025 |
| Knowledge cutoff | Apr 2025 | Jan 2025 | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct$30.00
- Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview$32.50
- Pixtral Large (25.02)$32.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct, Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview or Pixtral Large (25.02)?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview 35/100, Pixtral Large (25.02) 33/100, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct 28/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct on price and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct for long inputs. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct, Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview or Pixtral Large (25.02)?
Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is cheaper at $1.50 input / $7.50 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). Pixtral Large (25.02) costs $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (median across 3 API providers); Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview costs $1.25 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (official Google API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $3.00 per million tokens for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct versus $3.00 for Pixtral Large (25.02) (1× as much) and $3.44 for Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview (1.1× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers all three models yet. Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has not been scored yet, Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview has not been scored yet and Pixtral Large (25.02) has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct, Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview and Pixtral Large (25.02) yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has the largest context window at 262,144 tokens, against 128,000 for Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview and 128,000 for Pixtral Large (25.02). Maximum output per response: Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct up to 65,536, Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview up to 64,000, Pixtral Large (25.02) up to 8,192 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct accepts text; Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview accepts text and images; Pixtral Large (25.02) accepts text and images. Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview and Pixtral Large (25.02) is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview is the newest, released Oct 7, 2025. Pixtral Large (25.02) came out Apr 8, 2025; Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct came out Apr 2025. Knowledge cutoff: Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct Apr 2025, Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview Jan 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct vs Sonar Deep ResearchPerplexity
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct vs Command ACohere
- Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct vs Jamba LargeAI21 Labs
- Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview vs GPT-5-CodexOpenAI
- Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview vs Jamba LargeAI21 Labs
- Gemini 2.5 Computer Use Preview vs Command A TranslateCohere
