Qwen3.8 Max vs Claude Sonnet 5.5
Too close to call on our weighted score (Claude Sonnet 5.5 72, Qwen3.8 Max 69). The right pick depends on what you value most.
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.8 Max
69/100- ECI156.6
- Price$2.00 / $6.00
- Context1M
AnthropicClaude Sonnet 5.5
72/100- ECI165.2
- Price$2.00 / $10.00
- Context1M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Claude Sonnet 5.5 72/100, Qwen3.8 Max 69/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Claude Sonnet 5.5 for raw capability and Qwen3.8 Max on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityClaude Sonnet 5.5Capabilities Index (ECI): Claude Sonnet 5.5 165.2 · Qwen3.8 Max 156.6
- Lowest priceQwen3.8 MaxQwen3.8 Max $3.00 · Claude Sonnet 5.5 $4.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextAbout the sameQwen3.8 Max 1,000,000 · Claude Sonnet 5.5 1,000,000 tokens
- Widest inputsQwen3.8 MaxQwen3.8 Max: Text, Images, PDFs, Video · Claude Sonnet 5.5: Text, Images, PDFs
- Self-hostingNo open weightsBoth are available only through APIs
| Measure | Weight | Qwen3.8 Max | Claude Sonnet 5.5 |
|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 86 | 97 |
| Price | 25% | 27 | 21 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 90 | 80 |
| Context window | 10% | 60 | 60 |
| Overall | 100% | 69/100 | 72/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Qwen3.8 MaxAlibaba (Qwen) | Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 156.6 | 165.2 (best) |
| ECI rank | #20 of 148 | #3 of 148 (best) |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 92.7% | 95.6% (best) |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | 74.7% | 88.8% (best) |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 99.4% | 100% (best) |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 45.8% | 46.5% (best) |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $2.00 | $2.00 |
| Output | $6.00 (best) | $10.00 |
| Cached input | $0.25 | $0.20 (best) |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.00 (best) | $4.00 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Alibaba API | Official Anthropic API |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens (best) | 128,000 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | Yes |
| PDFs | Yes | Yes |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yeslow · medium · xhigh | Yeslow · medium · high · xhigh · max |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| API model ID | qwen3.8-max | claude-sonnet-5-5 |
| API providers | 25 (best) | 23 |
| Released | Aug 3, 2026 | Sep 28, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | Jun 2026 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Qwen3.8 Max$32.00
- Claude Sonnet 5.5$40.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Qwen3.8 Max or Claude Sonnet 5.5?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 2 points (Claude Sonnet 5.5 72/100, Qwen3.8 Max 69/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Claude Sonnet 5.5 for raw capability and Qwen3.8 Max on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 Max or Claude Sonnet 5.5?
Qwen3.8 Max is cheaper at $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). Claude Sonnet 5.5 costs $2.00 input / $10.00 output per million tokens (official Anthropic API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $3.00 per million tokens for Qwen3.8 Max versus $4.00 for Claude Sonnet 5.5 (1.3× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Claude Sonnet 5.5 165.2 (#3 of 148) and Qwen3.8 Max 156.6 (#20 of 148). Their confidence ranges do not overlap (161.8–169.4 vs 154.5–158.8), so the gap is a real one. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Claude Sonnet 5.5 95.6%, Qwen3.8 Max 92.7%; FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 — Claude Sonnet 5.5 88.8%, Qwen3.8 Max 74.7%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Claude Sonnet 5.5 100%, Qwen3.8 Max 99.4%; SimpleQA Verified — Claude Sonnet 5.5 46.5%, Qwen3.8 Max 45.8%.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3.8 Max and Claude Sonnet 5.5 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Claude Sonnet 5.5 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.8 Max and Claude Sonnet 5.5 share the same 1,000,000-token context window. Maximum output per response: Qwen3.8 Max up to 131,072, Claude Sonnet 5.5 up to 128,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Qwen3.8 Max accepts text, images, PDFs and video; Claude Sonnet 5.5 accepts text, images and PDFs. Qwen3.8 Max handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
No. Qwen3.8 Max and Claude Sonnet 5.5 are proprietary and only available through APIs and apps.
Which is newer?
Claude Sonnet 5.5 is the newest, released Sep 28, 2026. Qwen3.8 Max came out Aug 3, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Claude Sonnet 5.5 Jun 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
