ZMIME
Comparison · 3 models · Updated Oct 4, 2026

Qwen3.8 Max vs Inkling Small vs Grok 4.6

Too close to call on our weighted score (Inkling Small 70, Qwen3.8 Max 69, Grok 4.6 65). The right pick depends on what you value most.

  1. Alibaba (Qwen)

    Qwen3.8 Max

    Released Aug 3, 2026

    69/100
    • ECI156.6
    • Price$2.00 / $6.00
    • Context1M
  2. Thinking Machines

    Inkling Small

    Released Jul 30, 2026

    70/100
    • ECI150.2
    • Price$0.50 / $1.20
    • Context1.05M
  3. xAI

    Grok 4.6

    Released Aug 12, 2026

    65/100
    • ECI156.6
    • Price$2.00 / $6.00
    • Context500K
01 — Verdict

Too close to call

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Inkling Small 70/100, Qwen3.8 Max 69/100, Grok 4.6 65/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Grok 4.6 for raw capability, Inkling Small on price and Inkling Small for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

  • CapabilityGrok 4.6Capabilities Index (ECI): Grok 4.6 156.6 · Qwen3.8 Max 156.6 · Inkling Small 150.2
  • Lowest priceInkling SmallInkling Small $0.675 · Qwen3.8 Max $3.00 · Grok 4.6 $3.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
  • Longest contextInkling SmallInkling Small 1,048,576 · Qwen3.8 Max 1,000,000 · Grok 4.6 500,000 tokens
  • Widest inputsQwen3.8 MaxQwen3.8 Max: Text, Images, PDFs, Video · Inkling Small: Text, Images, Audio · Grok 4.6: Text, Images
  • Self-hostingInkling SmallPublishes downloadable weights (Apache-2.0)
How the score is built
MeasureWeightQwen3.8 MaxInkling SmallGrok 4.6
CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI)50%867886
Price25%275827
Inputs & features15%907070
Context window10%606148
Overall100%69/10070/10065/100
02 — Side by side

Every spec in one table

Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.

Qwen3.8 Max vs Inkling Small vs Grok 4.6 specifications side by side
SpecificationQwen3.8 MaxAlibaba (Qwen)Inkling SmallThinking MachinesGrok 4.6xAI
Capability
Capabilities Index (ECI)156.6150.2156.6 (best)
ECI rank#20 of 148#47 of 148#19 of 148 (best)
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions92.7%88.5%94.0% (best)
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics74.7% (best)46.3%66.0%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics99.4% (best)90.0%99.2%
SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions45.8%19.1%49.3% (best)
Price per million tokens
Input$2.00$0.50 (best)$2.00
Output$6.00$1.20 (best)$6.00
Cached input$0.25 (best)—$0.50
Blended (3:1)$3.00$0.675 (best)$3.00
Long-context rateSame rateSame rateOver 200K: $4.00 / $12.00
Price sourceOfficial Alibaba APIMedian of 11 providersOfficial xAI API
Limits
Context window1,000,000 tokens1,048,576 tokens (best)500,000 tokens
Max output131,072 tokens1,048,576 tokens (best)500,000 tokens
Inputs and features
TextYesYesYes
ImagesYesYesYes
PDFsYesNoNo
AudioNoYesNo
VideoYesNoNo
ReasoningYeslow · medium · xhighYesYeslow · medium · high · xhigh
Tool callingYesYesYes
Structured outputYesNoYes
Availability
WeightsProprietaryOpenApache-2.0Proprietary
API model IDqwen3.8-max—grok-4.6
API providers251129 (best)
ReleasedAug 3, 2026Jul 30, 2026Aug 12, 2026
Knowledge cutoff——Feb 1, 2026
03 — Cost

What would a month cost?

Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.

  • Qwen3.8 Max$32.00
  • Inkling Small$7.40
  • Grok 4.6$32.00
04 — Questions

Which should you choose?

Which is better: Qwen3.8 Max, Inkling Small or Grok 4.6?

It is close. Our weighted score puts them within a point (Inkling Small 70/100, Qwen3.8 Max 69/100, Grok 4.6 65/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Grok 4.6 for raw capability, Inkling Small on price and Inkling Small for long inputs. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 Max, Inkling Small or Grok 4.6?

Inkling Small is cheaper at $0.50 input / $1.20 output per million tokens (median across 11 API providers). Qwen3.8 Max costs $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price); Grok 4.6 costs $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (official xAI API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.675 per million tokens for Inkling Small versus $3.00 for Qwen3.8 Max (4.4× as much) and $3.00 for Grok 4.6 (4.4× as much).

Which scores higher on benchmarks?

Grok 4.6 scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Grok 4.6 156.6 (#19 of 148), Qwen3.8 Max 156.6 (#20 of 148) and Inkling Small 150.2 (#47 of 148). The confidence ranges of the top two overlap (154.7–158.9 vs 154.5–158.8), so treat the gap as small. On individual benchmarks: GPQA Diamond — Grok 4.6 94.0%, Qwen3.8 Max 92.7%, Inkling Small 88.5%; FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 — Qwen3.8 Max 74.7%, Grok 4.6 66.0%, Inkling Small 46.3%; OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025 — Qwen3.8 Max 99.4%, Grok 4.6 99.2%, Inkling Small 90.0%; SimpleQA Verified — Grok 4.6 49.3%, Qwen3.8 Max 45.8%, Inkling Small 19.1%.

Which is better for coding?

There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3.8 Max, Inkling Small and Grok 4.6 yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Grok 4.6 leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. All three support tool calling for agent workflows.

Which has the bigger context window?

Inkling Small has the largest context window at 1,048,576 tokens, against 1,000,000 for Qwen3.8 Max and 500,000 for Grok 4.6. Maximum output per response: Qwen3.8 Max up to 131,072, Inkling Small up to 1,048,576, Grok 4.6 up to 500,000 tokens.

Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?

Qwen3.8 Max accepts text, images, PDFs and video; Inkling Small accepts text, images and audio; Grok 4.6 accepts text and images. Qwen3.8 Max handles the widest range of inputs.

Are any of these open source?

Inkling Small publishes its weights (Apache-2.0) and can be self-hosted; Qwen3.8 Max and Grok 4.6 is proprietary.

Which is newer?

Grok 4.6 is the newest, released Aug 12, 2026. Qwen3.8 Max came out Aug 3, 2026; Inkling Small came out Jul 30, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: Grok 4.6 Feb 1, 2026.

How do you decide the winner?

Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.