Qwen3.8 Max vs DeepSeek V4 Flash
Too close to call on our weighted score (DeepSeek V4 Flash 71, Qwen3.8 Max 69). The right pick depends on what you value most.
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.8 Max
69/100- ECI156.6
- Price$2.00 / $6.00
- Context1M
DeepSeekDeepSeek V4 Flash
71/100- ECI146.1
- Price$0.14 / $0.28
- Context1M
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Too close to call
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (DeepSeek V4 Flash 71/100, Qwen3.8 Max 69/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3.8 Max for raw capability and DeepSeek V4 Flash on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
- CapabilityQwen3.8 MaxCapabilities Index (ECI): Qwen3.8 Max 156.6 · DeepSeek V4 Flash 146.1
- Lowest priceDeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek V4 Flash $0.175 · Qwen3.8 Max $3.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextAbout the sameQwen3.8 Max 1,000,000 · DeepSeek V4 Flash 1,000,000 tokens
- Widest inputsQwen3.8 MaxQwen3.8 Max: Text, Images, PDFs, Video · DeepSeek V4 Flash: Text
- Self-hostingDeepSeek V4 FlashPublishes downloadable weights
| Measure | Weight | Qwen3.8 Max | DeepSeek V4 Flash |
|---|---|---|---|
| CapabilityCapabilities Index (ECI) | 50% | 86 | 73 |
| Price | 25% | 27 | 86 |
| Inputs & features | 15% | 90 | 45 |
| Context window | 10% | 60 | 60 |
| Overall | 100% | 69/100 | 71/100 |
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Qwen3.8 MaxAlibaba (Qwen) | DeepSeek V4 FlashDeepSeek |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | 156.6 (best) | 146.1 |
| ECI rank | #20 of 148 (best) | #71 of 148 |
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level science questions | 92.7% | — |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1–3Research-level mathematics | 74.7% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025Competition mathematics | 99.4% | — |
| SimpleQA VerifiedShort factual questions | 45.8% | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $2.00 | $0.14 (best) |
| Output | $6.00 | $0.28 (best) |
| Cached input | $0.25 | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.00 | $0.175 (best) |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Official Alibaba API | Median of 42 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens | 384,000 tokens (best) |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No |
| PDFs | Yes | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yeslow · medium · xhigh | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | Yes | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| API model ID | qwen3.8-max | — |
| API providers | 25 | 48 (best) |
| Released | Aug 3, 2026 | Apr 24, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | May 2025 |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Qwen3.8 Max$32.00
- DeepSeek V4 Flash$1.96
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Qwen3.8 Max or DeepSeek V4 Flash?
It is close. Our weighted score puts them within 1 points (DeepSeek V4 Flash 71/100, Qwen3.8 Max 69/100), so choose by what matters most for your work: Qwen3.8 Max for raw capability and DeepSeek V4 Flash on price. The score weighs capability 50%, price 25%, inputs & features 15%, context window 10%.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 Max or DeepSeek V4 Flash?
DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper at $0.14 input / $0.28 output per million tokens (median across 42 API providers). Qwen3.8 Max costs $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens (official Alibaba API price). At a typical mix of three input tokens to one output token, that is $0.175 per million tokens for DeepSeek V4 Flash versus $3.00 for Qwen3.8 Max (17× as much).
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
Qwen3.8 Max scores higher on the Capabilities Index (ECI): Qwen3.8 Max 156.6 (#20 of 148) and DeepSeek V4 Flash 146.1 (#71 of 148). Their confidence ranges do not overlap (154.5–158.8 vs 143.6–147.9), so the gap is a real one.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3.8 Max and DeepSeek V4 Flash yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. On overall capability, Qwen3.8 Max leads, which tends to carry over to coding, but test on your own codebase. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.8 Max and DeepSeek V4 Flash share the same 1,000,000-token context window. Maximum output per response: Qwen3.8 Max up to 131,072, DeepSeek V4 Flash up to 384,000 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Qwen3.8 Max accepts text, images, PDFs and video; DeepSeek V4 Flash accepts text. Qwen3.8 Max handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
DeepSeek V4 Flash publishes its weights and can be self-hosted; Qwen3.8 Max is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Qwen3.8 Max is the newest, released Aug 3, 2026. DeepSeek V4 Flash came out Apr 24, 2026. Knowledge cutoff: DeepSeek V4 Flash May 2025.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Grok 4.6Three-way comparison
- Qwen3.8 Max vs Grok 4.6xAI · ECI 156.6
- Qwen3.8 Max vs Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic · ECI 156.3
- Qwen3.8 Max vs GLM-5.3Z.ai (Zhipu) · ECI 155.8
- Qwen3.8 Max vs Muse Spark 1.3Meta · ECI 156.9
- DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Qwen3.5 FlashAlibaba (Qwen) · ECI 144.0
- DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Gemma 4 31B ITGoogle · ECI 142.8
