Qwen3.8 Max Preview vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Qwen3.8 Max Preview comes out ahead, 47 to 34 on our weighted score.
- Our pick
Alibaba (Qwen)Qwen3.8 Max Preview
47/100- ECI—
- Price$2.00 / $6.00
- Context1M
- Alibaba (Qwen)
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
34/100- ECI—
- Price$2.00 / $6.00
- Context262K
Add a model
Make it a three-way comparison.
Qwen3.8 Max Preview is our pick
Qwen3.8 Max Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 47/100 against Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (34). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
- CapabilityNot enough dataNo independent benchmark covers every model here yet
- Lowest priceSame priceQwen3.8 Max Preview $3.00 · Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B $3.00 per 1M tokens (3:1 blend)
- Longest contextQwen3.8 Max PreviewQwen3.8 Max Preview 1,000,000 · Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B 262,144 tokens
- Widest inputsQwen3.8 Max PreviewQwen3.8 Max Preview: Text, Images, Video · Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: Text
- Self-hostingQwen3.8 2.4T A95BPublishes downloadable weights (qwen3.8-max)
| Measure | Weight | Qwen3.8 Max Preview | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | 50% | 27 | 27 |
| Inputs & features | 30% | 70 | 45 |
| Context window | 20% | 60 | 37 |
| Overall | 100% | 47/100 | 34/100 |
Left out because at least one model lacks the data: capability. The remaining weights were rescaled.
Every spec in one table
Highlighted cells lead their row. Dashes mean the data is not published.
| Specification | Qwen3.8 Max PreviewAlibaba (Qwen) | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BAlibaba (Qwen) |
|---|---|---|
| Capability | ||
| Capabilities Index (ECI) | — | — |
| ECI rank | — | — |
| Price per million tokens | ||
| Input | $2.00 | $2.00 |
| Output | $6.00 | $6.00 |
| Cached input | — | — |
| Blended (3:1) | $3.00 | $3.00 |
| Long-context rate | Same rate | Same rate |
| Price source | Median of 6 providers | Median of 21 providers |
| Limits | ||
| Context window | 1,000,000 tokens (best) | 262,144 tokens |
| Max output | 131,072 tokens | 131,072 tokens |
| Inputs and features | ||
| Text | Yes | Yes |
| Images | Yes | No |
| PDFs | No | No |
| Audio | No | No |
| Video | Yes | No |
| Reasoning | Yes | Yes |
| Tool calling | Yes | Yes |
| Structured output | No | Yes |
| Availability | ||
| Weights | Proprietary | Openqwen3.8-max |
| API model ID | — | — |
| API providers | 6 | 21 (best) |
| Released | Jul 19, 2026 | Aug 12, 2026 |
| Knowledge cutoff | — | — |
What would a month cost?
Enter your expected volume in millions of tokens. List prices only; caching and batch discounts would lower these.
- Qwen3.8 Max Preview$32.00
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B$32.00
Which should you choose?
Which is better: Qwen3.8 Max Preview or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
Qwen3.8 Max Preview is the better all-round choice, scoring 47/100 against Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B (34). It leads on inputs & features and context window. The score weighs price 50%, inputs & features 30%, context window 20%. None of the shared benchmarks cover every model here yet, so capability is left out of this verdict.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 Max Preview or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
Qwen3.8 Max Preview and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B cost the same: $2.00 input / $6.00 output per million tokens.
Which scores higher on benchmarks?
There is no independent benchmark that covers both models yet. Qwen3.8 Max Preview has not been scored yet and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has not been scored yet.
Which is better for coding?
There are no published SWE-bench Verified results for Qwen3.8 Max Preview and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B yet, so there is no like-for-like coding score. Test both on a sample of your own tasks. Both support tool calling for agent workflows.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.8 Max Preview has the largest context window at 1,000,000 tokens, against 262,144 for Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B. Maximum output per response: Qwen3.8 Max Preview up to 131,072, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B up to 131,072 tokens.
Which can read images, PDFs, audio or video?
Qwen3.8 Max Preview accepts text, images and video; Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B accepts text. Qwen3.8 Max Preview handles the widest range of inputs.
Are any of these open source?
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B publishes its weights (qwen3.8-max) and can be self-hosted; Qwen3.8 Max Preview is proprietary.
Which is newer?
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B is the newest, released Aug 12, 2026. Qwen3.8 Max Preview came out Jul 19, 2026.
How do you decide the winner?
Each model gets a 0–100 score on capability (50%, independent benchmark results); price (25%, blended price per million tokens (3 input : 1 output), log scale); inputs & features (15%, image, PDF, audio and video input, tool calling, structured output and reasoning); context window (10%, maximum tokens per request, log scale). Dimensions missing for any model are dropped and the remaining weights rescaled, so every model is judged on the same evidence. Specs and prices come from public model listings and the labs’ own API pages; capability scores come from independent benchmark runs. Data updated Oct 4, 2026.
Related comparisons
- Add Kimi K2.7 Code HighspeedThree-way comparison
- Qwen3.8 Max Preview vs Kimi K2.7 Code HighspeedMoonshot AI
- Qwen3.8 Max Preview vs ParetoUnbiased
- Qwen3.8 Max Preview vs Command A PlusCohere
- Qwen3.8 Max Preview vs Seed 2.1 ProByteDance Seed
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Kimi K2.7 Code HighspeedMoonshot AI
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs ParetoUnbiased
